Cited by 32Menstrual Health and DisordersPsychology and Mental HealthGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Challenging the Positioning of Premenstrual Change as PMS: The Impact of a Psychological Intervention on Women’s Self-Policing

Ussher, Jane M.·2008·Qualitative Research in Psychology

Abstract

The positioning of the reproductive body as a site of madness or badness functions to marginalize women and to medicalize their distress. Taking Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) as a case example, this paper rejects this pathologization and argues that self-policing practices are associated with the experience and construction of premenstrual change as PMS. Drawing on interviews with 12 British women, it is argued that women's experience of distress or anger premenstrually is connected to self-policing practices of self-silencing, self-surveillance, overresponsibility, self-blame, and self-sacrifice, and that their positioning of this distress as PMS takes place through a process of subjectification. An outline is given of a woman-centred psychological intervention, which identified and challenged these self-policing practices. It aimed to allow women to develop more empowering strategies for reducing or preventing premenstrual distress, build an ethic of care for the self, and no longer blame the body for premenstrual anger or depression. Pre-intervention, the themes which emerged in interviews were: PMS sufferer as split; self-silencing; and overresponsibility. Post-intervention, the themes were: increased equality and agency; resisting pathologization; and resisting self-sacrifice and overresponsibility. The implications for the conceptualization and treatment of PMS and for the positioning of the reproductive body as site of psychiatric disorder are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14780880701863567

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ussher, J. M.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ussher, Jane M.
Venue
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Published
2008-03-07
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
33-44
ISSN
  • 1478-0887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-0895
OpenAlex
W2085560644
Cited by
32
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Research in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University College London
  • University of Western Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual distress, self-policing, medicalization, self-silencing, self-surveillance, self-blame, self-sacrifice, subjectification, care ethics, women's agency, reproductive body

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review