Cited by 86Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychology and Mental Health

PMS as a process of negotiation: Women’s experience and management of premenstrual distress

Ussher, Jane M., Perz, Janette·2013·Psychology & Health

Abstract

The absence of reports of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in contexts such as China, Hong Kong, and India has led to the conclusion that PMS is a culture-bound syndrome. This qualitative study examines whether is it possible for women in a Western cultural context to negotiate negative premenstrual change in order to effectively avoid or reduce premenstrual distress. Sixty women who self-defined as a 'PMS sufferer' took part in one-to-one interviews, which were analysed using theoretical thematic analysis from a material-discursive-intrapsychic (MDI) perspective. Three major themes were consistently identified across relationship type and context, reflecting women's strategies of premenstrual self-regulation and coping: 'Self-monitoring and awareness: recognition and acceptance of premenstrual change'; 'Coping through self-regulation of premenstrual distress', including: 'avoidance of stress and conflict', 'escaping relational demands and responsibilities', and 'care of the self'; and 'Coping as an inter-subjective experience'. These findings challenge the view of PMS as a fixed unitary syndrome, suggesting that premenstrual change is an ongoing process of negotiation, in which women are agentic subjects, not passive 'PMS sufferers'. This has implications for therapists working with women reporting moderate-severe PMS, suggesting that the reframing of 'symptoms' as normal change, behavioural coping strategies, and self-monitoring, can effectively reduce premenstrual distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2013.765004

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ussher, Jane M.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2013-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
909-927
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2045306506
Cited by
86
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual distress, women's coping strategies, self-regulation, self-monitoring, culture-bound syndromes, psychotherapy implications
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Australia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Premenstrual Syndrome, Social Control, Informal, Stress, Psychological, Negotiating, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review