The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies
Abstract
This chapter attempts to provide empirical support for some of the key predictions of social identity theory. This theory not only describes the psychological processes underlying the desire to establish positive social identity, it also identifies antecedent conditions to the use of different options to improve one's status position. On the basis of the theoretical statements provided by social identity theory, a research programme, designed to investigate conditions under which group members would be inclined to pursue status improvement individually or as a group, was set up. A theoretical analysis implies that status structures can be characterized with a limited number of variables and that such socio-structural variables are likely to be important determinants of people's preference to display individualist or collectivist behaviour when striving for higher status. The main variables in this respect seem to be: (1) the relative status position of one's group; (2) the permeability of group boundaries; (3) the stability of group status; and (4) the legitimacy of personal status or group status. In a series of experiments, different status structures were simulated, in order to assess the cognitive and behavioural consequences for people operating in these structures. The outcomes of these experiments and their theoretical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Downward comparison principles in social psychology
Wills, T. A. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 · Cited by 2,705
Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process.
Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.908 · Cited by 158
Cited by
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1 · Cited by 2,298
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845
Self-citationA dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
Duckitt, J. (2001) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6 · Cited by 1,416
Assimilation and diversity: an integrative model of subgroup relations.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_03 · Cited by 756
The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities
Tyler, T. R. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4 · Cited by 755
The social psychology of protest
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479314 · Cited by 740
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007 · Cited by 640
Jetten, J., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, C., & Steffens, N. K. (2017) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2333 · Cited by 542
Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037 · Cited by 502
Depression and Social Identity: An Integrative Review
Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314523839 · Cited by 498
Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: women and mathematics
Pronin, E., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00088-x · Cited by 335
Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2008) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466607x206792 · Cited by 326
A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Identification and Health in Organizational Contexts
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Schuh, S. C., Jetten, J., & van Dick, R. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316656701 · Cited by 311
Agostini, M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000256 · Cited by 301
Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.006 · Cited by 248
Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship.
van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006 · Cited by 223
Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification?
Duguid, M. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.009 · Cited by 140
Servant leadership and engagement in a merge process under high uncertainty
Jorge Correia de Sousa, M., & van Dierendonck, D. (2014) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-07-2013-0133 · Cited by 138
Liu, X., & Zhao, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146559 · Cited by 63
Barrett, M., & Davis, S. C. (2007) · Handbook of Race, Racism, and the Developing Child · doi:10.1002/9781118269930.ch5 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellemers, N.
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-57
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2047153189
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
