Cited by 128Behavioral Health and InterventionsCultural Differences and ValuesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

The “Selfless” and Self-Regulation: The Role of Chronic Other-Orientation in Averting Self-Regulatory Depletion

SEELEY, ELIZABETH A., Gardner, WENDI L.·2003·Self and Identity

Abstract

Baumeister and colleagues (e.g., Baumeister, Heatherton, & Tice, 1994) have recently proposed a limited-strength model of self-regulation, whereby the effort of overtly controlling one's behavior requires considerable energy, and may lead to rapid depletion of the resource. The current research investigated individual differences in social orientation (e.g., collectivist cultural background and interdependent beliefs; other-directed self-monitoring), hypothesizing that those high in social orientation would be more motivated to engage in self-regulation in everyday social interaction, and thus may, over time, build greater self-regulatory strength. As expected, whereas those low in these motives replicated prior findings of depletion after self-regulation, individuals higher in these motives failed to show evidence of depletion. It appears as if chronic socially motivated exertion of self-control may lead to stable individual differences in self-regulatory performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15298860309034

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • East Asians from highly ritualized Confucian cultures have improved self-regulation compared with people from Western cultures, who are less ritualized.

    “For example, there is evidence suggesting that East Asians from highly ritualized Confucian cultures have improved self-regulation compared with people from Western cultures, who are less ritualized (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2007;Sarkissian, 2014;Seeley & Gardner, 2003).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Seeley & Gardner, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEELEY, E. A., & Gardner, W. L.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Self and Identity
Published
2003-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
103-117
ISSN
  • 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8876
OpenAlex
W2069556893
Cited by
128
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
self-regulation, self-regulatory depletion, other-orientation, social orientation, self-monitoring, collectivism, interdependence, individual differences, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review