The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing and Testing a Self-affirmation Manipulation
Abstract
We developed a new manipulation of self-affirmation that is simple to use, can be employed when circumstances prevent pre-screening or using essay-based methods, and has a highly equivalent control task. In the process, we addressed theoretical and empirical questions highlighted in a recent review as requiring attention. In comparison to five controls, the manipulation promoted positive changes on measures designed to test whether people are self-affirmed. It produced a similar pattern on these measures to an existing self-affirmation manipulation. The matched control also performed well. There was no evidence of mediation by mood or state self-esteem or moderation by trait self-esteem. We discuss the potential of the method and associated dependent measures in future self-affirmation research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Self-affirmation interventions typically have people write about core personal values.”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Napper et al. 2009
In the citing paper
“Although many inductions of self-affirmation exist, the most studied experimental manipulation has people write about core personal values (McQueen & Klein 2006;cf. Napper et al. 2009).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Napper et al. 2009
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
Morrow, C. E. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0624 · Cited by 6,166
Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
Cloninger, C. R. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.820-a · Cited by 4,212
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201272002 · Cited by 3,041
Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895 · Cited by 2,007 · cited 2×
“Another subgroup ( N = 188) instead completed the 20-item Current Thought Scale (Heatherton & Polivy, 1991 ) state self-esteem measure ( Not at all / A little bit / Somewhat / Very much / Extremely ).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137 · Cited by 1,302
Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B., & Babakus, E. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0323-4 · Cited by 448
Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212474694 · Cited by 362
Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization
West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y · Cited by 303
Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00233.x · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Napper, L., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Peter R.
- Venue
- Self and Identity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-62
- ISSN
- 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8876
- OpenAlex
- W2159932272
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, prescreening, mood, state self-esteem, trait self-esteem, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
