Cited by 563Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionBehavioral Health and Interventions

Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review

MCQueen, Amy, Klein, William M. P.·2006·Self and Identity

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review of studies using self-affirmation manipulations was to identify research gaps and provide information to guide future research. We describe study characteristics, categories of manipulations, and report effects on various dependent variables. Our search strategies yielded 47 eligible articles (69 studies). Manipulations varied by affirmation domain (values or personal characteristics), attainment (participant- or investigator-identified), and procedure (scale, essay, feedback, etc.). Most dependent variables were cognitive. Strong effects of self-affirmation were found for attitudes and persuasion/bias, but future work is needed for variables with mixed results including risk cognitions, intentions, and behavior. Suggestions and considerations for future research involving self-affirmation manipulations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15298860600805325

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-affirmation interventions typically have people write about core personal values.

    “Self-affirmation interventions typically have people write about core personal values.”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as McQueen & Klein 2006

  • The most studied experimental manipulation of self-affirmation has people write about core personal values.

    “Although many inductions of self-affirmation exist, the most studied experimental manipulation has people write about core personal values (McQueen & Klein 2006;cf. Napper et al. 2009).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as McQueen & Klein 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MCQueen, A., & Klein, W. M. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
MCQueen, Amy
Venue
Self and Identity
Published
2006-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
289-354
ISSN
  • 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8876
OpenAlex
W1965768481
Cited by
563
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-affirmation, values affirmation, persuasion, attitudes, risk cognition, intention, behavior, cognitive effects, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review