Cited by 48Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influence of Digital Influencer, e-WOM and Information Quality on Customer Repurchase Intention toward Online Shop in e-Marketplace during Pandemic COVID-19: The Mediation Effect of Customer Trust

Wandoko, Wanda, Panggati, Ignatius Enda·2022·Journal of Relationship Marketing

Abstract

Pandemic COVID-19 brought an impact on the decline of the economy in Indonesia. However, in the pandemic COVID-19, a lot of retailers switch their business to online shops that use e-marketplace. The study aims to empirically investigate factors that build customer repurchase intention toward Indonesia's online shop in the e-marketplace and explore the mediating impact of trust on repurchase intention. This study employs quantitative analyses. The respondent from this study is customers of online shop that use e-marketplaces in Indonesia. This study used SEM-PLS to analyze the research model and data. The model was empirically tested using 407 respondents’ data. The result showed that customer trust, digital influencer influence, social e-WOM, information quality positively impacted customer repurchase intention. The result also showed that customer trust mediates the relationship between variable digital influencer influence, information quality, and social e-WOM with customer repurchase intention. Moreover, social e-WOM and information quality are essential predictors in building customer repurchase intention. This study tries to reduce the gap in the marketing literature by providing empirical evidence about the influence of digital influencers on customer decision-making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15332667.2022.2035198

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.037 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/2158244019846212 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/21582440211045076 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.046 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.08.003 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Byrne B. M., 2010, Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application and programming
  8. 10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.019 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.021 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/0965254X.2016.1240213 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.013 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/30036519 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708 · DOI
  16. Hair J. F., 2010, Multivariate data analysis
  17. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.12776/qip.v22i2.1062 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/dir.10073 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1108/10662241311295782 · DOI
  21. Hu, X. & Ha, L. (2015). Which Form of Word-Of-Mouth is more important to Online Shoppers? A Comparative Study of WOM Use between General Population and College Students. Journal of Communication and Media Research, 7 (2), 15–35.
  22. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Jellinek E. M., 2021, Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 9, 192
  24. 10.1016/S0278-4319(00)00041-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.009 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.12.001 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139658 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/266687 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.011 · DOI
  30. 10.1108/MRR-07-2015-0161 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0373 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.01.001 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sarstedt M., 2020, Handbook of market research
  36. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.064 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Setiawan P. Y., 2014, International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3, 2319
  38. 10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100744 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/02642069.2015.1047827 · DOI
  42. 10.1108/JSM-01-2017-0031 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wandoko, W., & Panggati, I. E.
Affiliations
Binus University (ID)
Corresponding author
Panggati, Ignatius Enda
Venue
Journal of Relationship Marketing
Published
2022-02-11
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
148-167
ISSN
  • 1533-2667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-2675
OpenAlex
W4211031601
Cited by
48
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Relationship Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
social media influencers, information quality, repurchase intention, consumer trust, online marketplaces, online shopping, COVID-19 pandemic, mediating effect, Indonesian consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review