Cited by 133Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and AggressionHealth disparities and outcomes

Loneliness in Early Adolescence: Friendship Quantity, Friendship Quality, and Dyadic Processes

Open access
Lodder, Gerine M. A., Scholte, Ron H. J., Goossens, Luc, Verhagen, Maaike·2017·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Friendship quantity and quality are related to adolescent loneliness, but the exact link between these constructs is not well understood. The present study aimed to examine whether adolescents' perception of friendship quantity and quality, and the perceptions of their peers, were related to loneliness. We examined the relation between loneliness and the number of unilateral and reciprocal friendships and compared the views of best friendship quality. Overall, 1,172 Dutch adolescents (49.1% male, M age = 12.81, SD = .43) nominated their friends and rated their friendship quality. Friendship quantity was measured using sociometrics to distinguish reciprocated and unilateral (i.e., one-sided) friendships. The analyses indicated that loneliness was related to fewer reciprocal and unilateral-received friendships (i.e., the adolescent received a friendship nomination but did not reciprocate that nomination) and a lower quality of best friendship. Actor-partner interdependence analyses revealed that adolescents' loneliness was related to a less positive evaluation of their friendship, as reported by adolescents themselves (i.e., a significant actor effect) but not by their friends (i.e., nonsignificant partner effect). These findings (a) indicate that loneliness is negatively related to the number of friends adolescents have, as perceived by themselves and their peers and (b) suggest that, once a friendship is established, lonely adolescents may interpret the friendship quality less positively compared to their friends. Implications of these findings for our current understanding of adolescent loneliness are discussed, and suggestions for future research are outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2015.1070352

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional studies indicated that poor physical or psychological health, low economic status, poor friendship quality, bad relationships in family, being bullied, and lack of social and emotional support were linked to more severe loneliness among adolescents.

    “Cross-sectional studies indicated that poor physical or psychological health, low economic status, poor friendship quality, bad relationships in family, being bullied, and lack of social and emotional support were linked to more severe loneliness among adolescents.”

    From A Longitudinal Study of Loneliness Before the End of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trajectories, Predictors, and Impact on Chinese Adolescent Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion reports a cross-sectional association between adolescent loneliness and lower self-reported friendship quality. The paper does not establish the claimed links with low economic status, poor family relationships, bullying, or lack of social and emotional support. Its introduction describes physical and mental health problems as possible consequences of loneliness, not as factors linked to more severe loneliness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive peer relationships are associated with lower levels of loneliness in adolescents.

    “Irrespective of the quality of evidence, the replicability of the same results and conclusions across different populations, stages of adolescence, types of friendship quality in respect to gender and whether it is between best friends only, all supported the hypothesis that positive peer relationships were associated with lower levels of loneliness [55, 62, 67–71, 93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gillmour & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships 3: Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31-56). London: Academic Press. Running Head: Adolescent Loneliness and Friendships

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lodder, G. M. A., Scholte, R. H. J., Goossens, L., & Verhagen, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Lodder, Gerine M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2015-10-29
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
709-720
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2210491073
Cited by
133
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
adolescent loneliness, friendship quality, reciprocal friendship, best friendships, peer nominations, sociometric status, dyadic processes, actor-partner interdependence, peer perception
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Male, Peer Group, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review