Cited by 358Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionHealth disparities and outcomesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

On the outside looking in: loneliness and social monitoring

Gardner, Wendi L., Pickett, Cynthia L., Jefferis, Valerie, Knowles, Megan·2005·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The skill-deficit view of loneliness posits that unskilled social interactions block lonely individuals from social inclusion. The current studies examine loneliness in relation to social attention and perception processes thought to be important for socially skilled behavior. Two studies investigate the association between social monitoring (attention to social information and cues) and self-reported loneliness and number of close social ties. In Study 1, higher levels of loneliness are related to increased rather than decreased incidental social memory. In Study 2, individuals with fewer reported friends show heightened decoding of social cues in faces and voices. Results of these studies suggest that the attentional and perceptual building blocks of socially skilled behavior remain intact, and perhaps enhanced, in lonely individuals. Implications for recent models of belonging regulation and theories of loneliness are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167205277208

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vicarious learning's negative relationship with emotional loneliness decrease may be because loneliness does not hinder vicarious learning, as lonely individuals' attention to social information remains unaffected or enhanced.

    “Loneliness does not seem to hinder vicarious learning. In fact, previous findings show that the attention and perception of social information and cues remain unaffected or enhanced in lonely individuals (Gardner et al., 2005).”
  • More lonely individuals show increased attention toward social cues.

    “more lonely individuals show increased attention toward social cues (Gardner et al., 2005, Pickett et al., 2004).”

    From Dorsal raphe dopamine neurons represent the experience of social isolation (2016) · cites this paper as Gardner et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., Jefferis, V., & Knowles, M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2005-11
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1549-1560
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2142318362
Cited by
358
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, social monitoring, social attention, social perception, facial expressions, voice perception, social skills, social ties
MeSH terms
Affect, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cues, Emotions, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Psychological Theory, Mental Recall, Semantics, Social Perception, United States, Linear Models, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review