CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression Outcomes Predicted by Willingness to Engage in Homework, Compliance with Homework, and Cognitive Restructuring Skill Acquisition

Neimeyer, Robert A., Kazantzis, Nikolaos, Kassler, Dina M., Baker, Kurt D., Fletcher, Richard·2008·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
DOI 10.1080/16506070801981240
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is a need to understand the mechanism through which homework contributes to clinically meaningful change in therapy. Theoretically meaningful factors such as willingness to complete therapeutic assignments and cognitive skill acquisition have not been carefully studied in prior research. Depressed outpatients (N = 46) received cognitive behavioural group therapy for a 10-week period and were assigned relevant homework activities. Patient self-report and independent ratings of homework compliance were obtained on a session-by-session basis. Using path analysis, the authors found evidence that willingness to complete homework assignments and mastery of skill in cognitive restructuring helped account for the relationship between homework compliance and reduced symptom severity (R2 = .40). However, paths were only significant when patient self-report of homework compliance was used in the model. The present study highlights the problems in assessing homework compliance and in assuming that independent assessment of compliance is more accurate than patient self-report.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506070801981240

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Arbuckle J. L., 1999, Amos 4.0 user's guide
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.343 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beck A. T., 1979, Cognitive therapy of depression
  4. Burns D. D., 1980, Feeling good
  5. Burns D. D., 1989, The feeling good seminar participant workbook
  6. Burns D. D., 1991, Self‐Help Inventory (brief form)
  7. Derogatis L. R., 1974, Psychological measurement in psychopharmacology, 7, 79
  8. Dobson K. S., 2000, Handbook of psychological change, 409
  9. Kazantzis N., 2005, Using homework assignments in cognitive behavior therapy, 9, 10.4324/9780203499825 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lewinsohn P. M., 1973, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 291
  11. Rees C. S., 2003, Proceedings of the 38th APS Annual Conference, Perth, WA
  12. Spitzer R. L., 1990, Structured clinical interview for DSM‐III‐R non‐patient edition
  13. Triandis H. C., 1980, Nebraska symposium of motivation, 27, 195
  14. Young J., 1983, Assessment of competence in cognitive therapy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Neimeyer, R. A., Kazantzis, N., Kassler, D. M., Baker, K. D., & Fletcher, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • California State University, Stanislaus (US)
Corresponding author
Neimeyer, Robert A.
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
199-215
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
DOI
10.1080/16506070801981240
OpenAlex
W2032964427
Cited by
113
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Massey University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
group cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, homework compliance, cognitive restructuring, skill acquisition, treatment outcome prediction, patient self-report, symptom severity, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Manuals as Topic, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Compliance, Psychotherapy, Group, Tennessee, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Multivariate Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review