Cited by 122Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Automated Text Messaging as an Adjunct to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Clinical Trial

Open access
Aguilera, Adrian, Bruehlman-Senecal, Emma, Demasi, Orianna, Avila, Patricia·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for depression is efficacious, but effectiveness is limited when implemented in low-income settings due to engagement difficulties including nonadherence with skill-building homework and early discontinuation of treatment. Automated messaging can be used in clinical settings to increase dosage of depression treatment and encourage sustained engagement with psychotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test whether a text messaging adjunct (mood monitoring text messages, treatment-related text messages, and a clinician dashboard to display patient data) increases engagement and improves clinical outcomes in a group CBT treatment for depression. Specifically, we aim to assess whether the text messaging adjunct led to an increase in group therapy sessions attended, an increase in duration of therapy attended, and reductions in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) symptoms compared with the control condition of standard group CBT in a sample of low-income Spanish speaking Latino patients. METHODS: Patients in an outpatient behavioral health clinic were assigned to standard group CBT for depression (control condition; n=40) or the same treatment with the addition of a text messaging adjunct (n=45). The adjunct consisted of a daily mood monitoring message, a daily message reiterating the theme of that week's content, and medication and appointment reminders. Mood data and qualitative responses were sent to a Web-based platform (HealthySMS) for review by the therapist and displayed in session as a tool for teaching CBT skills. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses on therapy attendance during 16 sessions of weekly therapy found that patients assigned to the text messaging adjunct stayed in therapy significantly longer (median of 13.5 weeks before dropping out) than patients assigned to the control condition (median of 3 weeks before dropping out; Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney z=-2.21, P=.03). Patients assigned to the text messaging adjunct also generally attended more sessions (median=6 sessions) during this period than patients assigned to the control condition (median =2.5 sessions), but the effect was not significant (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney z=-1.65, P=.10). Both patients assigned to the text messaging adjunct (B=-.29, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.19, z=-5.80, P<.001) and patients assigned to the control conditions (B=-.20, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.07, z=-3.12, P=.002) experienced significant decreases in depressive symptom severity over the course of treatment; however, the conditions did not significantly differ in their degree of symptom reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for automated text messaging as a tool to sustain engagement in CBT for depression over time. There were no differences in depression outcomes between conditions, but this may be influenced by low follow-up rates of patients who dropped out of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.6914

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies show that receiving simple text messaging reminders increases attendance to face-to-face treatment sessions among people of color.

    “The feasibility of this approach is supported by previous studies showing that receiving simple text messaging reminders increases attendance to face-to-face treatment sessions among POC [54,55].”

    From App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Methods (Intervention; page unavailable) describe weekly texts reminding patients to attend group psychotherapy, and the Results (Outcomes; page unavailable) report that the texting group attended more sessions on average, but the difference was not statistically significant. The intervention also included other messages, so the study does not establish that simple reminders themselves increased attendance. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Text messaging reminders have proven effective in increasing treatment adherence among POC community samples, including those in app-based mindfulness meditation studies.

    “Text messaging reminders have proven effective in increasing treatment adherence among POC community samples [54-56,63], including those in app-based mindfulness meditation studies [49].”

    From App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Discussion (Principal Findings and Conclusions; page unavailable) reports decreased attrition and later dropout among low-income, Spanish-speaking Latino patients receiving texts alongside group CBT. But the intervention included more than reminders, so the trial does not establish that reminders themselves caused the improvement. The app-based mindfulness clause is cited to a different source [49], not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G Cognitive Therapy of Depression: A Personal Reflection 1979 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aguilera, A., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Demasi, O., & Avila, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-05-08
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
e148
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612408532
Cited by
122
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH094442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression, cognitive behavioral therapy, text messaging, mobile health, mood tracking, treatment engagement, medication adherence, group therapy, low-income patients, clinician dashboard, PHQ-9, school dropout prevention, homework adherence
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review