Cited by 137Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pain catastrophizing as repetitive negative thinking: A development of the conceptualization

Open access
Flink, Ida Landström, Boersma, Katja, Linton, Steven J.·2013·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Pain catastrophizing is a well-known concept in the pain literature and has been recognized as one of the most powerful psychological determinants of negative outcomes for pain problems. However, relatively little effort has been put into developing its theoretical underpinnings. More specifically, the intrinsic function of catastrophizing is not explicitly dealt with in contemporary theoretical models. The aim of this article is to add to existing models by proposing a development of the conceptualization of catastrophizing that stresses its function as an emotion regulator. We argue that catastrophizing can be conceptualized as a form of negative repetitive thinking, which is abstract, intrusive, and difficult to disengage from. It has been argued that repetitive negative thinking is a form of ineffective problem solving that functions to downregulate negative affect and that it can be regarded as an avoidant coping strategy because it impedes processing of emotional and somatic responses. Thus, in our conceptualization, catastrophizing is proposed to be a form of problem-solving behavior that functions to reduce negative emotion triggered by pain, and other related stimuli. Furthermore, we argue that catastrophizing is preferably regarded as a process where cognitions, emotions, and overt behavior are intertwined and not viewed as separate entities. To underscore the latter, we suggest the term catastrophic worry. Our intention with this development of the conceptualization is to give rise to new ideas for research and clinical practice and to revitalize discussions about the theoretical framework around pain-related catastrophizing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2013.769621

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]30. Nolem-Hoeksema, S. (2005). Lost in thought: Rumination and depression, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flink, I. L., Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J.
Affiliations
Örebro University (SE)
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2013-08-26
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
215-223
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2024697591
Cited by
137
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, repetitive negative thinking, emotion regulation, avoidance coping, negative affect, pain-related emotions, problem-solving behavior
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attention, Humans, Models, Psychological, Pain, Thinking, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review