Cited by 22Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The impact of experiential avoidance on the relations between illness representations, pain catastrophising and pain interference in chronic pain

Karademas, Evangelos C., Karekla, Maria, Flouri, Magdalini, Vasiliou, Vasilis S., Kasinopoulos, Orestis, Papacostas, Savvas S.·2017·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to examine the effects of experiential avoidance (EA) on the indirect relationship of chronic pain patients' illness representations to pain interference, through pain catastrophising Design and main outcome measure: The sample consisted of 162 patients diagnosed with an arthritis-related or a musculoskeletal disorder. The effects of EA on the pathway between illness representations, pain catastrophising and pain interference were examined with PROCESS, a computational tool for SPSS Results: After controlling for patient and illness-related variables and pain severity, the 'illness representations-pain catastrophising-pain interference' pathway was interrupted at the higher levels of EA. The reason was that, at the high levels of EA, either the relation of illness representations to pain catastrophising or the relation of pain catastrophising to pain interference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The findings indicate that EA is not a generalised negative response to highly aversive conditions, at least as far as the factors examined in this study are concerned. EA may rather reflect a coping reaction, the impact of which depends on its specific interactions with the other aspects of the self-regulation mechanism. At least in chronic pain, EA should become the focus of potential intervention only when its interaction with the illness-related self-regulation mechanism results in negative outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2017.1346193

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karademas, E. C., Karekla, M., Flouri, M., Vasiliou, V. S., Kasinopoulos, O., & Papacostas, S. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics (CY)
Corresponding author
Karademas, Evangelos C.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2730022229
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
experiential avoidance, illness representations, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, chronic pain, self-regulation, coping, arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, mediation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Avoidance Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review