Cited by 38HIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesInternational Development and AidHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

After the Global Fund: Who can sustain the HIV/AIDS response in Peru and how?

Amaya, Ana B., Caceres, Carlos F., Spicer, Neil, Balabanova, Dina·2014·Global Public Health

Abstract

Peru has received around $70 million from Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund). Recent economic growth resulted in grant ineligibility, enabling greater government funding, yet doubts remain concerning programme continuity. This study examines the transition from Global Fund support to increasing national HIV/AIDS funding in Peru (2004-2012) by analysing actor roles, motivations and effects on policies, identifying recommendations to inform decision-makers on priority areas. A conceptual framework, which informed data collection, was developed. Thirty-five in-depth interviews were conducted from October to December 2011 in Lima, Peru, among key stakeholders involved in HIV/AIDS work. Findings show that Global Fund involvement led to important breakthroughs in the HIV/AIDS response, primarily concerning treatment access, focus on vulnerable populations and development of a coordination body. Nevertheless, reliance on Global Fund financing for prevention activities via non-governmental organisations, compounded by lack of government direction and weak regional governance, diluted power and caused role uncertainty. Strengthening government and regional capacity and fostering accountability mechanisms will facilitate an effective transition to government-led financing. Only then can achievements gained from the Global Fund presence be maintained, providing lessons for countries seeking to sustain programmes following donor exit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2013.878957

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress, having a management or monitoring system in place, and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms.

    “Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress [64, 65], having a management or monitoring system in place [15, 53, 61, 66, 67], and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms [46, 47, 52, 54, 68, 69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Caceres, C., Giron, M., Sandoval, C., Lopez, R., Pajuelo, J., Valverde, R. et al. (2009). Effects of the implementation of Global Fund-supported HIV/AIDS projects on health systems, civil society and affected communities, 2004-2007. In The Maximizing Positive Synergies Academic Consortium (Ed.), Interactions between Global Health Initiatives and Health Systems: evidence from countries (pp. 134-143). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. (2009). Global Fund to provide $24 million of new funding to fight HIV/AIDS in Russia [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/mediacenter/newsreleases/2009-11-13\_Global\_Fund\_to\_provide\_USD\_24\_million\_of\_new\_funding\_to\_fight\_HIV\_AIDS\_in\_Russia/
  3. International AIDS Society. (2009). Global Fund extension of HIV prevention programmes for people at high risk for HIV in Russia will save thousands of young lives [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=383

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amaya, A. B., Caceres, C. F., Spicer, N., & Balabanova, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Amaya, Ana B.
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
9
Issue
1-2
Pages
176-197
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W2063663692
Cited by
38
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
Global Fund, HIV/AIDS response, program sustainability, Peru, HIV/AIDS policy, treatment access, vulnerable populations, non-governmental organizations, regional governance, accountability mechanisms, capacity building
MeSH terms
Financial Support, Health Promotion, Humans, International Cooperation, Peru, Policy Making, HIV Infections, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review