Cited by 28Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

How are qualitative methods used in diabetes research? A 30-year systematic review

Hennink, Monique M., Kaiser, Bonnie N., Sekar, Swathi, Griswold, Emily P., Ali, Mohammed K.·2017·Global Public Health

Abstract

We aimed to describe how qualitative methods are used in global research on diabetes and identify opportunities whereby qualitative methods could further benefit our understanding of the human experience of diabetes and interventions to address it. We conducted a systematic review of National Library of Medicine, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases to identify original research articles that used qualitative methods to study diabetes between 1980 and 2011. We identified 554 eligible articles and categorised these by geographic region, year of publication, study population, study design, research question, qualitative data collection methods, and journal type. Results show low use of qualitative methods in diabetes research over the past 30 years. The majority of articles (75%) reported using substantive qualitative research, while mixed-methods research has remained underutilised. Eighty-five per cent of articles reported studies conducted in North America or Europe, with few studies in developing countries. Most articles reported recruiting clinic-based populations (58%). Over half (54%) of research questions focused on patient experience and 24% on diabetes management. Qualitative methods can provide important insights about socio-cultural aspects of disease to improve disease management. However, they remain underutilised for understanding the diabetes experience, especially in Africa and Asia and amongst non-clinic populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2015.1120337

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., Sekar, S., Griswold, E. P., & Ali, M. K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Hennink, Monique M.
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2016-01-13
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
200-219
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W2238552548
Cited by
28
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes research, qualitative research, patient experience, diabetes management, mixed methods, international research trends, developing countries
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Health Services Research, Humans, Research Design, Qualitative Research, Culturally Competent Care, Sociological Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review