Cited by 98Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Developments with multi-target drugs for Alzheimer’s disease: An overview of the current discovery approaches

Open access
González, Juan F., Alcántara, Andrés R., Doadrio, Antonio L., Sánchez-Montero, Jose María·2019·Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common type of dementia among older adults, is a chronic neurodegenerative pathology that causes a progressive loss of cognitive functioning with a decline of rational skills. It is well known that AD is multifactorial, so there are many different pharmacological targets that can be pursued.Areas covered: The authors highlight the strategic value of privileged scaffolds in a multi-target lead compound generation against AD, exploring the concept of multi-target design, with a special emphasis on hybrid compounds. Hence, the most promising building blocks for designing and synthesizing hybrid anti-AD drugs are shown, while also presenting the more advanced hybrid compounds.Expert opinion: The available therapeutic arsenal for AD, designed under the traditional paradigm of ‘one-drug/one target/one-disease’, is based on the inhibition of brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to increase acetylcholine (ACh) levels. However, this classical approach has not been sufficiently effective when used to treat any multifactor-depending pathology (cancer, diabetes or AD). The multi-target drug concept has been quickly adopted by medicinal chemists. The basic research developments reported in recent years are a solid foundation that will pave the way for the construction of future AD therapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17460441.2019.1623201

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González, J. F., Alcántara, A. R., Doadrio, A. L., & Sánchez-Montero, J. M.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Sánchez-Montero, Jose María
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Published
2019-06-05
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
879-891
ISSN
  • 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-045X
OpenAlex
W2949937187
Cited by
98
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid Foundation (PR26/16-16B)
  • Ministerio de Industria, Economía y Competitividad (CTQ2017-86170)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, multi-target drugs, privileged scaffolds, hybrid molecules, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, acetylcholine, neurodegeneration, drug discovery, lead compound design
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Humans, Drug Design, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review