Cited by 10RNA Interference and Gene DeliverySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Vaccines on demand, part II: future reality

Geall, Andrew J., Kis, Zoltan, Ulmer, Jeffrey B.·2023·Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the potential use of mRNA vaccines for a rapid pandemic response had been well described in the scientific literature, however during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak we witnessed the large-scale deployment of the platform in a real pandemic setting. Of the three RNA platforms evaluated in clinical trials, including 1) conventional, non-amplifying mRNA (mRNA), 2) base-modified, non-amplifying mRNA (bmRNA), which incorporate chemically modified nucleotides, and 3) self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), the bmRNA technology emerged with superior clinical efficacy. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the current state of these mRNA vaccine technologies, evaluates their strengths and limitations, and argues that saRNA may have significant advantages if the limitations of stability and complexities of manufacturing can be overcome. EXPERT OPINION: The success of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines has been remarkable. However, several challenges remain to be addressed before this technology can successfully be applied broadly to other disease targets. Innovation in the areas of mRNA engineering, novel delivery systems, antigen design, and high-quality manufacturing will be required to achieve the full potential of this disruptive technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17460441.2022.2147501

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • saRNAs use an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from an alphavirus and conserved sequence elements at the 5′ and 3′ ends for replication, leading to robust and durable expression of encoded protein cargo.

    “saRNAs use an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from an alphavirus and the corresponding conserved sequence elements at the 5′ and 3′ ends for replication, leading to robust and durable expression of encoded protein cargo5–7.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geall, A. J., Kis, Z., & Ulmer, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Replicate Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Immorna Biotherapeutics, Morrisville, North Carolina
Corresponding author
Ulmer, Jeffrey B.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Published
2022-11-23
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
119-127
ISSN
  • 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-045X
OpenAlex
W4309175814
Cited by
10
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, self-amplifying RNA, vaccine production, mRNA stability, mRNA delivery systems, antigen design, pandemic response
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, RNA, RNA, Messenger, Vaccines, Vaccines, Synthetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review