Cited by 208Immunotherapy and Immune Responsesinterferon and immune responsesRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Induction of an IFN-mediated antiviral response by a self-amplifying RNA vaccine: implications for vaccine design

Open access
Pepini, Timothy, Pulichino, Anne-Marie, Carsillo, Thomas, Carlson, Alicia L, Sari-Sarraf, Farid, Ramsauer, Katrin, Debasitis, Jason C, Maruggi, Giulietta +5 more·2017·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

RNA-based vaccines have recently emerged as a promising alternative to the use of DNA-based and viral vector vaccines, in part because of the potential to simplify how vaccines are made and facilitate a rapid response to newly emerging infections. SAM vaccines are based on engineered self-amplifying mRNA (SAM) replicons encoding an Ag, and formulated with a synthetic delivery system, and they induce broad-based immune responses in preclinical animal models. In our study, in vivo imaging shows that after the immunization, SAM Ag expression has an initial gradual increase. Gene expression profiling in injection-site tissues from mice immunized with SAM-based vaccine revealed an early and robust induction of type I IFN and IFN-stimulated responses at the site of injection, concurrent with the preliminary reduced SAM Ag expression. This SAM vaccine-induced type I IFN response has the potential to provide an adjuvant effect on vaccine potency, or, conversely, it might establish a temporary state that limits the initial SAM-encoded Ag expression. To determine the role of the early type I IFN response, SAM vaccines were evaluated in IFN receptor knockout mice. Our data indicate that minimizing the early type I IFN responses may be a useful strategy to increase primary SAM expression and the resulting vaccine potency. RNA sequence modification, delivery optimization, or concurrent use of appropriate compounds might be some of the strategies to finalize this aim.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1601877

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The early and intense type I IFN response induced by saRNA detection hinders replication and antigen expression.

    “The early and intense type I IFN response induced by saRNA detection hinders replication and antigen expression, similar to unmodified mRNA5,13–15.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports an early response to self-amplifying RNA and says type I IFN may inhibit replicon amplification and antigen expression. The antigen-expression effect is supported by the section “SAM-driven Ag expression is enhanced in IFNAR KO and MAR1-5A3-treated mice” (page unavailable), but the paper presents inhibition of replication as a possibility, not an established result. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One copy of saRNA produces multiple copies of RNA transcripts by the above-described mechanism to initiate self-amplification of antigen genes in the cell.

    “As a result, one copy of saRNA produces multiple copies of RNA transcripts by the above-described mechanism to initiate self-amplification of antigen genes in the cell.35,195,196”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [195]

  • Owing to its self-replicative nature, lower doses of saRNA seem to be required to reach the same translational level compared with non-replicative mRNAs.

    “Moreover, owing to its self-replicative nature, in which the encoded replicase enables multiple copies of the antigen-encoding RNA, lower doses seem to be required to reach the same translational level compared with non-replicative mRNAs.153,154”

    From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [153]

  • The type I IFN activity of mRNA vaccines can prematurely stop mRNA translation, thereby reducing antigen availability and diminishing the vaccine's efficacy to obtain adaptive immune responses.

    “the type I IFN activity of mRNA vaccines can prematurely stop mRNA-translation, thereby reducing antigen availability and diminishing the vaccine's efficacy to obtain adaptive immune responses [63,64]”

    From The dawn of mRNA vaccines: the COVID-19 case (2021) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pepini, T., Pulichino, A.-M., Carsillo, T., Carlson, A. L., Sari-Sarraf, F., Ramsauer, K., Debasitis, J. C., Maruggi, G., Otten, G. R., Geall, A. J., Yu, D., Ulmer, J. B., & Iavarone, C.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics , Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research , Cambridge, MA 02139
Corresponding author
  • Pepini, Timothy
  • Maruggi, Giulietta
  • Yu, Dong
  • Iavarone, Carlo
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2017-05
Volume
198
Issue
10
Pages
4012-4024
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2610471486
Cited by
208
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, type I interferon, IFN-stimulated genes, antiviral response, vaccine adjuvants, vaccine design
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Immunologic, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Antigens, Interferon Type I, Respiratory Syncytial Viruses, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Viral, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines, Drug Design, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mice, Vaccine Potency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review