Cited by 48RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Corticosteroids and cellulose purification improve, respectively, the in vivo translation and vaccination efficacy of sa-mRNAs

Open access
Zhong, Zifu, McCafferty, Séan, Opsomer, Lisa, Wang, Haixiu, Huysmans, Hanne, De Temmerman, Joyca, Lienenklaus, Stefan, Portela Catani, João Paulo +2 more·2021·Molecular Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Synthetic mRNAs are an appealing platform with multiple biomedical applications ranging from protein replacement therapy to vaccination. In comparison with conventional mRNA, synthetic self-amplifying mRNAs (sa-mRNAs) are gaining interest because of their higher and longer-lasting expression. However, sa-mRNAs also elicit an innate immune response, which may complicate their clinical application. Approaches to reduce the innate immunity of sa-mRNAs have not been studied in detail. Here we investigated, in vivo, the effect of several innate immune inhibitors and a novel cellulose-based mRNA purification approach on the type I interferon (IFN) response and the translation and vaccination efficacy of our formerly developed sa-mRNA vaccine against Zika virus. Among the investigated inhibitors, we found that corticosteroids and especially topical application of clobetasol at the sa-mRNA injection site was the most efficient in suppressing the type I IFN response and increasing the translation of sa-mRNA. However, clobetasol prevented formation of antibodies against sa-mRNA-encoded antigens and should therefore be avoided in a vaccination context. Residual dsRNA by-products of the in vitro transcription reaction are known inducers of immediate type I IFN responses. We additionally demonstrate a drastic reduction of these dsRNA by-products upon cellulose-based purification, reducing the innate immune response and improving sa-mRNA vaccination efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.01.023

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The early and intense type I IFN response induced by saRNA detection hinders replication and antigen expression.

    “The early and intense type I IFN response induced by saRNA detection hinders replication and antigen expression, similar to unmodified mRNA5,13–15.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results report that the sa-mRNA vaccine induced a rapid IFN-β response peaking within five hours, and the Introduction says type I IFN can induce enzymes that inhibit mRNA translation. These passages support the early response and its potential to hinder antigen expression, but our copy does not establish that the response hinders sa-mRNA replication. The Discussion instead says the IFN-β peak occurs before replication, addressing what triggers the response rather than whether it inhibits replication. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhong, Z., McCafferty, S., Opsomer, L., Wang, H., Huysmans, H., De Temmerman, J., Lienenklaus, S., Portela Catani, J. P., Combes, F., & Sanders, N. N.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Niek N.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
1370-1381
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123562152
Cited by
48
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
self-amplifying mRNA, corticosteroids, clobetasol, type I interferon response, innate immune response, mRNA translation, mRNA vaccines, Zika vaccine, topical application, antibody response
MeSH terms
Zika Virus Infection, Zika Virus, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Cellulose, Clobetasol, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Interferon Type I, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review