Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: Goal maintenance and microadjustments of control

Unsworth, Nash, Redick, Thomas S., Spillers, Gregory J., Brewer, Gene A.·2012·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
DOI 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Variation in working memory capacity (WMC) and cognitive control was examined in four experiments. In the experiments high- and low-WMC individuals performed a choice reaction time task (Experiment 1), a version of the antisaccade task (Experiment 2), a version of the Stroop task (Experiment 3), and an arrow version of the flanker task (Experiment 4). An examination of response time distributions suggested that high- and low-WMC individuals primarily differed in the slowest responses in each experiment, consistent with the notion that WMC is related to active maintenance abilities. Examination of two indicators of microadjustments of control (posterror slowing and conflict adaptation effects) suggested no differences between high- and low-WMC individuals. Collectively these results suggest that variation in WMC is related to some, but not all, cognitive control operations. The results are interpreted within the executive attention theory of WMC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Blais C., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
  2. 10.1016/0160-2896(94)90021-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.71 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.298 · DOI
  6. Cohen J.D., 2004, Cognitive neuroscience of attention,, 71
  7. 10.1038/74783 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3286-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00012-8 · DOI
  11. 10.3758/BF03200977 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Duncan J., 1995, The cognitive neurosciences,, 721
  13. 10.1038/nn1594 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00020-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1037/a0015251 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/74899 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2307/1130951 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90218-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hasher L., 2007, Variation in working memory,
  22. Heitz R.P., 2003, Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual attention,
  23. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217 · DOI
  24. Jensen A.R., 1998, The g factor,
  25. 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kane M.J., 2007, Variation in working memory,
  27. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.749 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1017/S1355617709990701 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00426-008-0191-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nn1051 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/17470210802479329 · DOI
  35. 10.3758/APP.72.7.2013 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/h0022853 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1037/0882-7974.10.2.238 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.506 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/a0018274 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.intell.2009.08.002 · DOI
  45. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1302 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70197-7 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.003 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
  • School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AR, USA
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-02
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
326-355
ISSN
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
DOI
10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
Cited by
84
References
18
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.