Cited by 120Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAction Observation and SynchronizationBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Witnessing peer rejection during early adolescence: Neural correlates of empathy for experiences of social exclusion

Open access
Masten, Carrie L., Eisenberger, Naomi I., Pfeifer, Jennifer H., Dapretto, Mirella·2010·Social Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies with adults have begun to reveal the neural bases of empathy; however, this research has focused on empathy for physical pain, rather than empathy for negative social experiences. Moreover, this work has not examined adolescents who may frequently witness and empathize with others that experience negative social experiences such as peer rejection. Here, we examined neural activity among early adolescents observing social exclusion compared to observing inclusion, and how this activity related to both trait empathy and subsequent prosocial behavior. Participants were scanned while they observed an individual whom they believed was being socially excluded. At least one day prior to the scan they reported their trait empathy, and following the scan they wrote emails to the excluded victim that were rated for prosocial behavior (e.g., helping, comforting). Observing exclusion compared to inclusion activated regions involved in mentalizing (i.e., dorsomedial prefrontal cortex), particularly among highly empathic individuals. Additionally, individuals who displayed more activity in affective, pain-related regions during observed exclusion compared to inclusion subsequently wrote more prosocial emails to excluded victims. Overall findings suggest that when early adolescents witness social exclusion in their daily lives, some may actually 'feel the pain' of the victims and act more prosocially toward them as a result.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470919.2010.490673

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 12- to 13-year-olds, activity in the mentalizing network was related to observed exclusion compared to observed inclusion.

    “Activity in the mentalizing network was related to observed exclusion compared to observed inclusion.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Masten et al. 2010

  • In the same study, recruitment of dmPFC and ATC appeared related to self-reported trait empathy, but only anterior insula showed a positive correlation with prosocial behavior.

    “Although recruitment of the dmPFC and ATC appeared to be related to self-reported trait empathy, only the anterior insula showed a positive correlation with prosocial behavior.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Masten et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Batson CD Gilbert DT Fiske ST Lindzey G Altruism and prosocial behavior The Handbook of Social Psychology 1998 Vols. 1 and 2 282 316 McGraw-Hill New York, NY
  2. Botvinick M Viewing facial expressions of pain engages cortical areas involved in the direct experience of pain Neuroimage 2005 25 312 319 15734365
  3. Brown BB Feldman SS Elliot GR Peer groups and peer cultures At the threshold: The developing adolescent 1990 171 196 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
  4. Coie JD Dodge KA Kupersmidt JB Asher SR Coie JD Peer group behavior and social status Peer rejection in childhood. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development 1990 17 59 Cambridge University Press New York, NY
  5. Davis MH Mitchell KV Hall JA Lothert J Snapp T Meyer M Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors Journal of Personality 1999 67 469 503 10483118
  6. Decety J Meyer M From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account Development and Psychopathology 2008 20 1053 1080 18838031
  7. Decety J Michalska KJ Akitsuki Y Who caused the pain? An fMRI investigation of empathy and intentionality in children Neuropsychologia 2008 46 2607 2614 18573266
  8. Denham SA Renwick-DeBardi S Hewes S Emotional communication between mothers and preschoolers: relations with emotional competence Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1994 40 488 508
  9. Dovidio JF Allen JL Schroeder DA Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990 59 249 260
  10. Eisenberger NI Gable SL Lieberman MD fMRI responses relate to differences in real-world social experience Emotion 2007 7 745 754 18039043
  11. Frith CD Frith U Interacting minds – A biological basis Science 1999 286 1692 1695 10576727
  12. Frith U Frith CD Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences 2003 358 459 473 PMC1693139 12689373
  13. Frith U Leslie AM Morton J The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: Autism Trends in Neurosciences 1991 14 433 438 1722361
  14. Immordino-Yang MH McColl A Damasio H Damasio A Neural correlates of compassion Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009 106 8021 8026 PMC2670880 19414310
  15. Jackson PL Bruney E Meltzoff AN Decety J How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy Neuroimage 2005 24 771 779 15652312
  16. Lieberman MD Cunningham WA Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2009 4 423 428 20035017 PMC2799956
  17. Litvak-Miller W McDougall D Romney DM The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 1997 123 303 324 9259121
  18. Masten CL Morelli S Eisenberger NI Feeling others’ social pain: An fMRI investigation of empathy for social exclusion under review 21122817
  19. Mitchell JP Banaji MR Macrae CN The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005 17 1306 1315 16197685
  20. Morrison I Lloyd D Di Pellegrino G Roberts N Vicarious responses to in anterior cingulate cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue? Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004 4 270 278 15460933
  21. Nezlek JB Feist GJ Wilson FC Plesko RM Day-to-day variability in empathy as a function of daily events and mood Journal of Research in Personality 2001 35 401 423
  22. Oswald PA The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping Journal of Social Psychology 1996 136 613 623 8942318
  23. Pfeifer JH Iacoboni M Mazziotta JC Dapretto M Mirroring others’ emotions related to empathy and interpersonal competence in children Neuroimage 2008 39 2076 2085 18082427 PMC3840169
  24. Schroeder DA Dovidio JF Sibicky ME Matthews LL Allen JL Empathic concern and helping behavior: Egoism or altruism? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1988 24 333 353
  25. Singer T The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2006 30 855 863 16904182
  26. Whalen PJ Shin LM McInerney SC Fischer H Wright CI Rauch SL A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger Emotion 2001 1 70 83 12894812
  27. Wicker B Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust Neuron 2003 40 655 664 14642287

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Pfeifer, J. H., & Dapretto, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Masten, Carrie L.
Venue
Social Neuroscience
Published
2010-10-14
Volume
5
Issue
5-6
Pages
496-507
ISSN
  • 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0927
OpenAlex
W2168539802
Cited by
120
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642, RR 13642, RR00865, M01RR000865, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
empathy, social exclusion, peer rejection, early adolescence, neural correlates of empathy, mentalization, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, prosocial behavior, trait empathy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Child, Empathy, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Rejection, Psychology, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review