Cited by 50Reproductive Health and ContraceptionVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Pharmacodynamics of combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives: Effects on metabolism

Bastianelli, Carlo, Farris, Manuela, Rosato, Elena, Brosens, Ivo, Benagiano, Giuseppe·2016·Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The pharmacodynamic effects of various combined oral estrogen-progestin combinations (COC) are examined for their components alone or in the various combined formulations. Special emphasis is given to products containing natural estrogens. Areas covered: Recent information on the effect of androgens, estrogens, progestins, as well as various COC combinations on the coagulation cascade will be reviewed aiming at providing an updated picture. The present article reviews hemostatic changes occurring during use of classic and modern combinations of estrogens (ethinyl estradiol, estradiol, estradiol valerate and estetrol) and new progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, dienogest, drospirenone, nomegestrol acetate), compared to classic compounds, such as levonorgestrel. Both pro- and anti-coagulatory effects of COC in healthy women are detailed and possible links with incidence of thromboembolic events are discussed. Expert commentary: Overall, the picture is reassuring: the use of natural estrogens and of new generation progestins has reduced pro-coagulatory changes in healthy subjects, although the observed differences in the risk of venous thromboembolism between second and third generation progestins is still incompletely understood. At the same time, there still is a need for large comparative and surveillance studies before firm conclusions can be drawn. At any rate, available evidence indicates that hemostatic effects of the newer COC, especially those utilizing natural estrogens, are minimal and often remain with the normal range.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17512433.2017.1271708

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastianelli, C., Farris, M., Rosato, E., Brosens, I., & Benagiano, G.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology (BE)
Corresponding author
Farris, Manuela
Venue
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2016-12-15
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1129-1144
ISSN
  • 1751-2433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-2441
OpenAlex
W2560857678
Cited by
50
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
combined oral contraceptives, estrogen-progestin combination, pharmacodynamics, coagulation, hemostasis, thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism risk, natural estrogens, ethinyl estradiol, estradiol valerate, estetrol, progestins, desogestrel, gestodene, dienogest, drospirenone, nomegestrol acetate, levonorgestrel, androgens
MeSH terms
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Progestins, Bone Density, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review