Cited by 119Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

Exploring a mindfulness meditation program on the mental health of upper primary children: a pilot study

Joyce, Andrew, Etty-Leal, Janet, Zazryn, Tsharni, Hamilton, Amy·2010·Advances in School Mental Health Promotion

Abstract

In Australia, 14% of children and adolescents have a significant mental health problem, which is similar to global prevalence estimates of 12%. Teaching children techniques in mindfulness meditation has been recommended to improve their mental health. However, the recommendations are based mainly on efficacy in adult clinical trials, and insufficiently on trials with children and adolescents in a classroom setting. This mindfulness meditation pilot project involved training teachers at two primary schools in the outer suburbs of Melbourne, Australia to deliver a ten-week mindfulness curriculum and optional daily mindfulness exercises to students in grades 5 and 6 (ages 10 to 12). Pre- and post-program, students completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and a modified version of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). On both scales there was a significant decrease in overall average score and the number of children in the diagnostic categories, 25.6% scoring in the borderline or diagnostic category for the SDQ pre-program and 16.3% post-program. For the CDI this was 25.8% pre- and 21.6% post-. The study is limited by its use of a pre-post design without comparison group. However, qualitative findings from teachers assist in discerning key themes, and this pilot study suggests the potential of more formal experimental testing of mindfulness training as an element of a whole-school mental health promotion program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1754730x.2010.9715677

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many novice meditators report finding meditation training particularly difficult and express uncertainty on whether they are "doing it right," which could lead to them abandoning their practise.

    “Many novice meditators report finding meditation training particularly difficult (152, 153) and express uncertainty on whether they are “doing it right” (154), which could lead to them abandoning their practise.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joyce, A., Etty-Leal, J., Zazryn, T., & Hamilton, A.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Advances in School Mental Health Promotion
Published
2010-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
17-25
ISSN
  • 1754-730X (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-8535
OpenAlex
W2023724061
Cited by
119
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in School Mental Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, child mental health, upper elementary students, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Children's Depression Inventory, childhood depression, classroom intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review