The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia.
Open accessAbstract
Normal perception involves experiencing objects within perceptual scenes as real, as existing in the world. This property of "perceptual presence" has motivated "sensorimotor theories" which understand perception to involve the mastery of sensorimotor contingencies. However, the mechanistic basis of sensorimotor contingencies and their mastery has remained unclear. Sensorimotor theory also struggles to explain instances of perception, such as synesthesia, that appear to lack perceptual presence and for which relevant sensorimotor contingencies are difficult to identify. On alternative "predictive processing" theories, perceptual content emerges from probabilistic inference on the external causes of sensory signals, however, this view has addressed neither the problem of perceptual presence nor synesthesia. Here, I describe a theory of predictive perception of sensorimotor contingencies which (1) accounts for perceptual presence in normal perception, as well as its absence in synesthesia, and (2) operationalizes the notion of sensorimotor contingencies and their mastery. The core idea is that generative models underlying perception incorporate explicitly counterfactual elements related to how sensory inputs would change on the basis of a broad repertoire of possible actions, even if those actions are not performed. These "counterfactually-rich" generative models encode sensorimotor contingencies related to repertoires of sensorimotor dependencies, with counterfactual richness determining the degree of perceptual presence associated with a stimulus. While the generative models underlying normal perception are typically counterfactually rich (reflecting a large repertoire of possible sensorimotor dependencies), those underlying synesthetic concurrents are hypothesized to be counterfactually poor. In addition to accounting for the phenomenology of synesthesia, the theory naturally accommodates phenomenological differences between a range of experiential states including dreaming, hallucination, and the like. It may also lead to a new view of the (in)determinacy of normal perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Hence the agent’s model must be able to entertain ‘counterfactually rich’ representations; i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs that these actions would bring about”
From 'Seeing the Dark': Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference (2018) · cites this paper as Seth, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The latter case fits well with Seth’s (2014) related proposal that the perceived ‘realness’ of objects depends on the identification of features invariant to some potential (counterfactual) manipulation of the object.”
From 'Seeing the Dark': Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference (2018) · cites this paper as Seth, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, it has been suggested that such counterfactual aspects of perceptual prediction may underlie basic properties perceptual experience, such as ‘presence’ or ‘objecthood’ [36].”
From Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain (2016) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This formulation is reminiscent of certain action-oriented or enactive appro aches to consciousness, such as sensorimotor contingency theory (O'Regan, 2011; O'Regan & Noë, 2001; see also Seth, 2014).”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Seth, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Journal of Consciousness Studies
(2022) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · doi:10.53765/20512201 · Cited by 6,852
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 1×
“It is important to say exactly what is distinctive about PPSMC as compared to standard predictive coding (e.g., Rao & Ballard, 1999) and active inference (Friston, Mattout, & Kilner, 2011).”
BackgroundA theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
The principles of psychology, Vol I.
James, W. (1890) · doi:10.1037/10538-000 · Cited by 4,514
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness
O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115 · Cited by 3,126
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bubic A., 2010, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 25
- Friston K. J., 2012, Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 151
- Kohler I., 1951, Psychological Issues, 3, 1
- Luke D. P., 2013, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 753
- Seth A. K., 2011, Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 395
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–348 of 348
The role of torso stiffness and prediction in the biomechanics of anxiety: a narrative review
Chin, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1487862 · Cited by 1
From unconscious inference to the beholder's share: predictive perception and human experiencePreprint
Seth, A. K. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zvbkp_v1
Self-citationTransforming Writing Pedagogy in Indonesian Higher Education: A Comparative Framework
Sudimantara, L. B., Baehaqi, L., Lian, A., & Lian, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91387-7_2
O szczurach i ludziach II. Wykorzystanie pragmatystycznego podejścia do Zasady Energii Swobodnej
Słuszkiewicz, Z. (2025) · Zoophilologica · doi:10.31261/zoophilologica.2025.15.13
WITHDRAWNPreprint
(2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4cnxg_v1
Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Medicine:From the Science of Consciousness
Koganemaru, S. (2025) · リハビリテーション医学 : 日本リハビリテーション医学会誌 · doi:10.2490/jjrmc.62.428
Singh, S. L. R. R. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00800-8_20
Singleton, R. L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5389116
Motyka, P., Schwartzman, D. J., Seth, A. K., & Suzuki, K. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103934
Self-citationEpistemological Models of Cognitive Feelings
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0005
Cognitive Feelings and Emotions
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0003
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0015
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0014
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.002.0005
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0001
Psychological Models of Cognitive Feelings
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0004
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0009
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0008
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.002.0004
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0013
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0007
Reality, Familiarity, and Recognition
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0010
Dokic, J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191976650.003.0011
Roseby, W., Racey, C., & Ward, J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.29.685428
Synchronicity, Flexibility, and the Path to Machine Consciousness: A Theoretical FrameworkPreprint
Curry, J. D. (2025) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/pyfqx_v1
‘Phenomenology’ is Blue: The Synaesthetic Dynamics of Being-in-the-World
Stendera, M. (2025) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-025-09829-7
Rappe, S., & Werning, M. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2498738
Presence Is Reality: Rethinking Virtual and Real-World Consciousness
Singleton, O., & Fotopoulou, A. (2026) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916251414030 · Cited by 2
Semantic Anchors: How Object Familiarity and Rotational Context Shape Rotation Perception in VR
Xu, L., Ke, P., & Cassinelli, Á. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2026.3679120
En perspective : le perspectivisme au prisme des sciences humaines contemporaines
Chamois, C. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/15d8629bz0dacz4201z8aedz62fc77469946
Kuske, N., & VanRullen, R. (2026) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10073-3_19
The life-world as the empirical basis of science
Pantazakos, T., & Wiltsche, H. A. (2026) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-026-10159-x
Suzuki, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819038
Capanni, L. (2026) · Trends in the history of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12446-3_8
Rich Experience and Sparse Awareness
berlinger, A., & Eitam, B. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009757126
Субъект как процесс стабилизации опытаPreprint
Gladkov, S. (2026) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3115580
Phenomenally Skilful Intuitions
Egler, M. (2026) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-026-01128-6
Perception, action, and consciousness
Kiverstein, J. D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29258-3.00081-1
The sociality of consciousness
Robbins, P. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29258-3.00049-5
Singh, S. L. R. R., & Chakrabarty, S. (2026) · Studies in Rhythm Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19974-4_10
Coming to grips with the application of predictive processing in sports and sports coaching
Kennedy, A. (2026) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541261466493
Nurhidayah, I. F., Aulia, C., Yumna, N. Y., Sudimantara, L. B., & Aisyiyah, M. N. (2026) · Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference · doi:10.54855/paic.2694
Stawski, F., & Tofilski, M. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05841-1
Temporal signatures of prediction error reveal external forces on an embodied robot
Klintefors, P., Johansson, B., & Balkenius, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2026.1918275
Roseby, W., Racey, C., & Ward, J. (2026) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag109
Metadata
- Authors
- Seth, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Seth, Anil K.
- ORCID
- Seth, Anil K.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-118
- ISSN
- 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-8936
- PMC
- PMC4037840
- OpenAlex
- W2080654992
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (258749)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G007543/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- predictive processing, sensorimotor contingencies, perceptual presence, synesthesia, counterfactual reasoning, generative models, dreams, hallucinations, probabilistic inference
- MeSH terms
- Synesthesia, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Perception, Perceptual Disorders, Photic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review