The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental health and psychological wellbeing in the early stages of doctoral study: a systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A broader systematic evaluation of other relevant mental health issues remains lacking, including clinically defined syndromes such as social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), personality disorders, eating disorders, alcohol and drug abuse, and burnout, as well as common symptoms of psychological”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Systematic and narrative reviews highlight additional sample-level moderators, including protective and risk factors35–42. These include financial challenges43, self-doubt44, and social and academic loneliness14,45 as risk factors, and suggest social support, a positive and future-oriented mindset, and self-care14 as potential protective factors.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“With that said, our findings add to evidence of the relationships between IP and anxiety, depression, and loneliness (Jackman et al., 2022; Pervez et al., 2020).”
From Exploring relationships between self-compassion, impostor phenomenon, and mental health among doctoral students (2025) · cites this paper as Jackman et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“The results of the present study offer additional evidence of the strong relationship between IP and mental distress among doctoral students (Jackman et al., 2022; Pervez et al., 2020).”
From Exploring relationships between self-compassion, impostor phenomenon, and mental health among doctoral students (2025) · cites this paper as Jackman et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 · Cited by 3,569
Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4089 · Cited by 1,441
Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440 · Cited by 1,363 · cited 1×
“Following guidelines for convergent synthesis designs (Pluye and Hong 2014), all quantitative data were transformed into codes (e.g. the code anxiety captured quantitative findings on this concept) via the process of ‘qualitising’ (Pope, Mays, and Popay 2007), thus permitting codes from all…”
MethodWork organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 12×
“2020), the rates of which are consistently estimated at 30-50% (Golde 2005; Levecque et al. 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialImproving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 · Cited by 1,082 · cited 3×
“At least one quality concern was identified with more than half of studies in the review (see online Appendix 5 for additional information) based on the MMAT criteria (Hong et al. 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Bujold, M., & Wassef, M. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2 · Cited by 754 · cited 1×
“A systematic mixed studies review employing the data-based convergent synthesis design (Hong et al. 2017) was adopted to ensure that the full breadth of methodologies (i.e. quantitative, qualitative, mixed method) and evidence was obtained.”
MethodSverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4113 · Cited by 616
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1080/1066568980310305 · DOI
- 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515760 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/030910042000275963 · DOI
- 10.28945/3862 · DOI
- 10.12968/ijtr.2005.12.3.19553 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638237.2020.1818196 · DOI
- Cohen S., 1988, The Social Psychology of Health, 31
- 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360.2019.1680957 · DOI
- 10.1080/0164212X.2020.1832942 · DOI
- 10.28945/3790 · DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0350 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0167.28.5.428 · DOI
- 10.5539/hes.v6n1p24 · DOI
- 10.28945/3396 · DOI
- 10.7899/JCE-15-27 · DOI
- 10.5961/jhes.2019.361 · DOI
- 10.2147/PRBM.S195131 · DOI · Paper page
- Lovibond S. H., 1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales
- 10.1177/1521025117736871 · DOI
- 10.28945/3948 · DOI
- 10.28945/1765 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.28945/2347 · DOI
- Pope C., 2007, Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods
- 10.1080/13548506.2020.1842471 · DOI
- 10.28945/4064 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0176210 · DOI
- 10.25304/rlt.v26.2131 · DOI
- 10.1177/1477971419842887 · DOI
- 10.1108/17597511111178014 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006223-198809000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1080/17482631.2019.1598722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07294360.2018.1541074 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00078.x · DOI
- Ziapour A., 2017, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clarke, B. J., & Hartley, M. T. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1669075 · Cited by 3
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackman, P. C., Jacobs, L., Hawkins, R. M., & Sisson, K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-06-22
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-313
- ISSN
- 2156-8235
- 2156-8243
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Student Mental Health Research network
- UK Research and Innovation (ES/S00324X/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
