The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on three L2 writing conditions: Students’ perceptions and use of background languages when writing in English
Open accessAbstract
This paper gives an account of Norwegian upper secondary school students’ self-reported use of linguistic resources while composing a text in English (L2) under three different writing conditions, i.e. English-only, translation, and translanguaging. After writing a text in English, 200 students answered a questionnaire about their use of background languages as well as their perceptions of the assigned writing condition. A combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches to the analysis of the questionnaire data was employed to capture how the students use their background languages and what they consider to be relative advantages and disadvantages of the assigned writing condition. The results indicate: (i) a strong presence of English as a metacognitive language of choice in all three writing conditions, (ii) students’ strategic use of L1 to generate ideas and structure information, and (iii) students’ willingness to experiment with languages to enhance certain aspects of their writing. By integrating translation and translanguaging into the drafting stage of writing in a target language, the present study contributes to the empirical research that embraces bi- and multilingual approach to English writing instruction in modern language classrooms as they become more linguistically and culturally diverse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014) · doi:10.1057/9781137385765 · Cited by 3,831
Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education
Garcı́a, O., & Wei, L. (2013) · Cited by 1,512
Translanguaging: developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation
Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 · Cited by 651
Writing Expertise and Second‐Language Proficiency*
Cumming, A. (1989) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x · Cited by 641
Grosjean, F. (2008) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199281282.001.0001 · Cited by 588
Translanguaging and the Writing of Bilingual Learners
Velasco, P., & García, O. (2014) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2014.893270 · Cited by 466
Translanguaging in Bilingual Education
García, O., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2017) · Bilingual and Multilingual Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_9 · Cited by 392
L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers
Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(02)00084-x · Cited by 375
Focus on Multilingualism: A Study of Trilingual Writing
CENOZ, J., & GORTER, D. (2011) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01206.x · Cited by 375
Language-switching: Using the first language while writing in a second language
Woodall, B. R. (2002) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00051-0 · Cited by 246
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Berge K. L., 2005, Ungdommers skrivekompetanse. Norskeksamen som tekst Bind 2. [Adolescent leaners’ writing skills. Norwegian exam as text]
- García O., 2009, Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective
- García O., 2012, Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB guide for educators
- Hellekjær G. O., 2009, Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 198
- Hellekjær G. O., 2010, Hermes–Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 45, 11
- Hundahl A. K., 2010, Rammer for skriving. Om skriveutvikling i skole og yrkesliv [On development of writing skills in school and professional life], 51
- Ismail S. A. A., 2012, International Education Studies, 5, 173
- Manchón R. M., 2007, Language learner strategies: Thirst years of research and practice, 229
- Nygaard, A.M. (2010).An investigation of accuracy in the written English of upper secondary vocational school students[Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Stavanger.
- Williams C., 1996, The language policy: Taking stock, 39
- Wolfersberger M., 2003, TELS-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 7, 1
Cited by
Examining Pedagogical Translanguaging: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Prilutskaya, M. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6040180 · Cited by 125
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Prilutskaya, M., & Knoph, R.
- Affiliations
- Nord University (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Prilutskaya, M.
- Venue
- Cogent Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-186X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095207969
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- translanguaging, ESL writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on three L2 writing conditions: Students’ perceptions and use of background languages when writing in English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1832179
- The paper
- Prilutskaya, M., & Knoph, R. (2020). Research on three L2 writing conditions: Students’ perceptions and use of background languages when writing in English. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1832179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.