Cited by 17Mental Health via WritingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effectiveness of a Positive Writing Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Trial

Ziemer, Kathryn Schaefer, Fuhrmann, Amy, Hoffman, Mary Ann·2015·MYOPAIN

Abstract

Objectives: There is a need to develop efficient, cost-effective psychological interventions for chronic pain. Expressive writing has been found to produce beneficial psychological and physical outcomes for those with chronic medical conditions. Positive expressive writing may also be beneficial to those with musculoskeletal pain, but this type of writing has not been studied before with this population. The current study was a pilot to explore how chronic pain patients respond to two positive variations of the expressive writing paradigm.Methods: Ninety-three participants with chronic pain were recruited from chronic pain forums and completed the writing exercise. Participants were randomized to either self-compassion or self-efficacy writing and wrote for 20 min once a week for three consecutive weeks. Participants completed baseline and post-writing measures of pain severity, illness intrusiveness, pain acceptance, pain catastrophizing, depression symptoms, life satisfaction, self-compassion and chronic pain self-efficacy.Results: Overall, both types of writing helped participants, who reported that the exercise was a positive experience. Raters were able to accurately identify the writing group for the majority of participants, which indicates that most participants followed the writing instructions. Few differences were found between the two writing groups, though when participants in either group reported an increase in self-compassion or self-efficacy, they also reported better physical and psychological outcomes.Conclusions: Participants with chronic pain appear to be open to self-compassion and self-efficacy writing. Positive writing may be useful to the extent that it increases self-compassion and self-efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lower attrition rate was found in Ziemer et al.'s (2015) study among chronic pain patients (22%), but the online writing program was half the duration of the current program and yielded no significant increase in self-compassion.

    “A lower attrition rate was found in Ziemer et al.'s (2015) study among chronic pain patients (22%), but the online writing program was half the duration of the current program and, perhaps more importantly, yielded no significant increase in self-compassion.”
  • Greater improvement was found in the present study when compared to two previous studies using self-compassion interventions among pain patients.

    “Greater improvement was found in the present study when compared to two previous studies using self-compassion interventions among pain patients (Torrijos-Zarcero et al., 2021; Ziemer et al., 2015).”
  • The short duration of the program and/or the fact that their sample presented with a high rate of psychopathology, a history of unsuccessful treatment in specialized units and high rates of disability may have played a role in the more modest outcomes reported in these investigations.

    “The short duration of the program (Ziemer et al., 2015) and/or the fact that their sample presented with a high rate of psychopathology, a history of unsuccessful treatment in specialized units and high rates of disability (Torrijos-Zarcero et al., 2021) may have played a role in the more modest outcomes reported in these investigations.”
  • Most participants were women, and other participant characteristics, such as ethnicity or proportion of clients residing in rural areas, were not assessed which could limit generalizability.

    “Like other pain studies (e.g., Ziemer et al., 2015), most participants were women, and other participant characteristics, such as the ethnicity or the proportion of clients residing in rural areas, were not assessed which could limit generalizability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziemer, K. S., Fuhrmann, A., & Hoffman, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Ziemer, Kathryn Schaefer
Venue
MYOPAIN
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
23
Issue
3-4
Pages
143-154
ISSN
  • 2470-8593 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-8607
OpenAlex
W2605592213
Cited by
17
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MYOPAIN (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
chronic pain, expressive writing, self-compassion, self-efficacy, musculoskeletal pain, pain acceptance, pain catastrophizing, depression, life satisfaction, illness intrusiveness, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review