Cited by 197Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Effect of balance training on recovery of stability in children with cerebral palsy

Shumway‐Cook, Anne, Hutchinson, Susan, Kartin, Deborah, MSME, Robert Price, Woollacott, Marjorie·2003·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

This study examined the effect of massed practice in balance recovery of stability in six children (four males, two females; mean age 9 years 2 months, SD 2 years, range 7 years 5 months to 12 years 11 months) with cerebral palsy (CP). Four children were diagnosed with spastic diplegia (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] level II) and two with spastic hemiplegia (GMFCS level I). A single‐subject, multiple‐baseline experimental design involving three pairs of children matched for diagnosis was used. A moveable forceplate system was used to test and train reactive balance control. Area per second (i.e. area covered by the center of pressure over a one second period) and time to stabilization from center of pressure measures were calculated following perturbations. The intervention phase consisted of massed practice on the moving platform (100 perturbations/day for 5 days). Analysis included hierarchical linear modeling and a repeated measures ANOVA. All children demonstrated a significant improvement in their ability to recover stability as demonstrated by reduced center of pressure area and time to stabilization following training. These improvements were still present 30 days following completion of training. Results suggest that postural control mechanisms in school‐age children (7 to 13 years) with CP are modifiable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00963.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shumway‐Cook, A., Hutchinson, S., Kartin, D., MSME, R. P., & Woollacott, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
591-602
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W2121851520
Cited by
197
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (6T18 MC 00007-15-01)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS038714, 1R01 NS38714)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
cerebral palsy, balance training, postural stability, reactive balance control, center of pressure, massed practice, spastic diplegia, spastic hemiplegia, children, postural control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Child Welfare, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Posture, Psychomotor Performance, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Washington, Observer Variation, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome, Children with Disabilities, Recovery of Function, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review