Cited by 458Behavioral and Psychological StudiesPsychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design

Watson, P.J., Workman, Edward A.·1981·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7916(81)90055-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
Corresponding author
Watson, P.J.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
257-259
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146005410
Cited by
458
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
multiple baseline design, concurrent engineering, single-case experimental design, applied research methodology
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review