The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Doppler ultrasound provides a non-invasive method for the study of the uteroplacental circulation. In normal pregnancy, impedance to flow in the uterine arteries decreases with gestation, which may be the consequence of trophoblastic invasion of the spiral arteries and their conversion into low-resistance vessels. Pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction are associated with failure of trophoblastic invasion of spiral arteries, and Doppler studies, in these conditions, have shown that impedance to flow in the uterine arteries is increased. A series of screening studies involving assessment of impedance to flow in the uterine arteries have examined the potential value of Doppler in identifying pregnancies at risk of the complications of impaired placentation. This review examines the findings of Doppler studies in unselected populations. METHODS: Searches of a computerized medical database were performed to identify relevant studies. Only those studies that provided sufficient data to allow calculation of the performance of the test were included in the analysis. Likelihood ratios were calculated for each study and are reported for pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death as well as for more severe forms of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. RESULTS: The literature search identified 19 relevant studies, four of which were excluded from the further analysis. The main characteristics and results of the 15 remaining studies provided discrepant results, which may be the consequence of differences in Doppler technique for sampling, the definition of abnormal flow velocity waveform, differences in the populations examined, the gestational age at which women were studied and different criteria for the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Nevertheless, the studies provided evidence that increased impedance to flow in the uterine arteries is associated with increased risk for subsequent development of pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. In addition, women with normal impedance to flow in the uterine arteries constituted a group that have a low risk of developing obstetric complications related to uteroplacental insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The review suggests that increased impedance to flow in the uterine arteries in pregnancies attending for routine antenatal care identifies about 40% of those who subsequently develop pre-eclampsia and about 20% of those who develop fetal growth restriction. Following a positive test, the likelihood of these complications is increased by about 6 and 3.5 times, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KHONG, T. Y., DE WOLF, F., ROBERTSON, W. B., & BROSENS, I. (1986) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07830.x · Cited by 1,591
Fetal growth retardation and the arteries of the placental bed
Brosens, I., Dixon, H. G., & Robertson, W. B. (1977) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12676.x · Cited by 430
Cited by
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Cnossen, J. S., Morris, R. K., ter Riet, G., Mol, B. W. J., van der Post, J. A. M., Coomarasamy, A., Zwinderman, A. H., Robson, S. C., Bindels, P. J. E., Kleijnen, J., et al. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.070430 · Cited by 719
Roberts, J. M., & Gammill, H. S. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000188408.49896.c5 · Cited by 693
Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines
Phipps, E., Prasanna, D., Brima, W., & Jim, B. (2016) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.12081115 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Papageorghiou, A. T., Yu, C. K. H., Cicero, S., Bower, S., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 78-88
- ISSN
- 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-7058
- OpenAlex
- W2002025688
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/713605620
- The paper
- Papageorghiou, A. T., Yu, C. K. H., Cicero, S., Bower, S., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2002). Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/713605620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.