The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of ARK in stress-induced apoptosis in Drosophila cells
Open accessAbstract
The molecular mechanisms of apoptosis are highly conserved throughout evolution. The homologs of genes essential for apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have been shown to be important for apoptosis in mammalian systems. Although a homologue for CED-4/apoptotic protease-activating factor (Apaf)-1 has been described in Drosophila, its exact function and the role of the mitochondrial pathway in its activation remain unclear. Here, we used the technique of RNA interference to dissect apoptotic signaling pathways in Drosophila cells. Inhibition of the Drosophila CED-4/Apaf-1–related killer (ARK) homologue resulted in pronounced inhibition of stress-induced apoptosis, whereas loss of ARK did not protect the cells from Reaper- or Grim-induced cell death. Reduction of DIAP1 induced rapid apoptosis in these cells, whereas the inhibition of DIAP2 expression did not but resulted in increased sensitivity to stress-induced apoptosis; apoptosis in both cases was prevented by inhibition of ARK expression. Cells in which cytochrome c expression was decreased underwent apoptosis induced by stress stimuli, Reaper or Grim. These results demonstrate the central role of ARK in stress-induced apoptosis, which appears to act independently of cytochrome c. Apoptosis induced by Reaper or Grim can proceed via a distinct pathway, independent of ARK.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Death Receptors: Signaling and Modulation
Ashkenazi, A., & Dixit, V. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1305 · Cited by 5,866
Endonuclease G is an apoptotic DNase when released from mitochondria
Li, L. Y., Luo, X., & Wang, X. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083620 · Cited by 1,787
Clemens, J. C., Worby, C. A., Simonson-Leff, N., Muda, M., Maehama, T., Hemmings, B. A., & Dixon, J. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.110149597 · Cited by 843
Cited by
The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch
Cory, S., & Adams, J. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc883 · Cited by 4,032
The apoptosome: Signalling platform of cell death
Riedl, S. J., & Salvesen, G. S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2153 · Cited by 1,097
Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015
Galluzzi, L., Bravo-San Pedro, J. M., Vitale, I., Aaronson, S. A., Abrams, J. M., Adam, D., Alnemri, E. S., Altucci, L., Andrews, D., Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M., et al. (2015) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.137 · Cited by 1,002
Self-citationMarsden, V. S., O'Connor, L., O'Reilly, L. A., Silke, J., Metcalf, D., Ekert, P. G., Huang, D. C. S., Cecconi, F., Kuida, K., Tomaselli, K. J., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01101 · Cited by 578
Control of Apoptosis in the Immune System: Bcl-2, BH3-Only Proteins and More
Marsden, V. S., & Strasser, A. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141029 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, K. C., Ricci, J.-E., Droin, N. M., & Green, D. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-03-11
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1077-1087
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2008148353
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of ARK in stress-induced apoptosis in Drosophila cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.20112068
- The paper
- Zimmermann, K. C., Ricci, J.-E., Droin, N. M., & Green, D. R. (2002). The role of ARK in stress-induced apoptosis in Drosophila cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.20112068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.