Cited by 1,787Cell death mechanisms and regulationDNA Repair MechanismsMitochondrial Function and Pathology

Endonuclease G is an apoptotic DNase when released from mitochondria

Li, Lily Y., Luo, Xu, Wang, Xiaodong·2001·Nature

Abstract

Nucleosomal fragmentation of DNA is a hallmark of apoptosis (programmed cell death), and results from the activation of nucleases in cells undergoing apoptosis. One such nuclease, DNA fragmentation factor (DFF, a caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (CAD) and its inhibitor (ICAD)), is capable of inducing DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation after cleavage by caspase-3 (refs 2,3,4). However, although transgenic mice lacking DFF45 or its caspase cleavage site have significantly reduced DNA fragmentation, these mice still show residual DNA fragmentation and are phenotypically normal. Here we report the identification and characterization of another nuclease that is specifically activated by apoptotic stimuli and is able to induce nucleosomal fragmentation of DNA in fibroblast cells from embryonic mice lacking DFF. This nuclease is endonuclease G (endoG), a mitochondrion-specific nuclease that translocates to the nucleus during apoptosis. Once released from mitochondria, endoG cleaves chromatin DNA into nucleosomal fragments independently of caspases. Therefore, endoG represents a caspase-independent apoptotic pathway initiated from the mitochondria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35083620

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The actual contribution of ENDOG to RCD in mammals has been questioned by generation of Endog−/− mice, whose cells display normal sensitivity to multiple lethal triggers.

    “the actual contribution of ENDOG to RCD in mammals [675] has been questioned by the generation of Endog−/− mice, whose cells display normal sensitivity to multiple lethal triggers [676, 677].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L. Y., Luo, X., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaodong
Venue
Nature
Published
2001-07-05
Volume
412
Issue
6842
Pages
95-99
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1480948328
Cited by
1,787
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 74
FWCI
46.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Keywords
endonuclease G, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, nucleosomal DNA fragmentation, DFF45, chromatin condensation, mitochondrial translocation, fibroblasts
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytochrome c Group, DNA, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Humans, Mitochondria, Liver, Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Ultraviolet Rays, Apoptosis, Caspases, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, Mice, Caspase 8, Caspase 9, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review