Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

B cells enhance early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis

Open access
Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M., Scumpia, Philip O., Weinstein, Jason S., Delano, Matthew J., Cuenca, Alex G., Nacionales, Dina C., Wynn, James L., Lee, Pui Y., Kumagai, Yutaro, Efron, Philip A., Akira, Shizuo, Wasserfall, Clive, Atkinson, Mark A., Moldawer, Lyle L.·2011·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Microbes activate pattern recognition receptors to initiate adaptive immunity. T cells affect early innate inflammatory responses to viral infection, but both activation and suppression have been demonstrated. We identify a novel role for B cells in the early innate immune response during bacterial sepsis. We demonstrate that Rag1−/− mice display deficient early inflammatory responses and reduced survival during sepsis. Interestingly, B cell–deficient or anti-CD20 B cell–depleted mice, but not α/β T cell–deficient mice, display decreased inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production and reduced survival after sepsis. Both treatment of B cell–deficient mice with serum from wild-type (WT) mice and repletion of Rag1−/− mice with B cells improves sepsis survival, suggesting antibody-independent and antibody-dependent roles for B cells in the outcome to sepsis. During sepsis, marginal zone and follicular B cells are activated through type I interferon (IFN-I) receptor (IFN-α/β receptor [IFNAR]), and repleting Rag1−/− mice with WT, but not IFNAR−/−, B cells improves IFN-I–dependent and –independent early cytokine responses. Repleting B cell–deficient mice with the IFN-I–dependent chemokine, CXCL10 was also sufficient to improve sepsis survival. This study identifies a novel role for IFN-I–activated B cells in protective early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20101715

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Kelly-Scumpia, K. M., Scumpia, P. O., Weinstein, J. S., Delano, M. J., Cuenca, A. G., Nacionales, D. C., Wynn, J. L., Lee, P. Y., Kumagai, Y., Efron, P. A., Akira, S., Wasserfall, C., Atkinson, M. A., & Moldawer, L. L.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2011-07-11
Volume
208
Issue
8
Pages
1673-1682
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2147610041
Cited by
175
References
4
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: B cells enhance early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20101715
The paper
Kelly-Scumpia, K. M., Scumpia, P. O., Weinstein, J. S., Delano, M. J., Cuenca, A. G., Nacionales, D. C., Wynn, J. L., Lee, P. Y., Kumagai, Y., Efron, P. A., Akira, S., Wasserfall, C., Atkinson, M. A., & Moldawer, L. L. (2011). B cells enhance early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20101715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.