The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stereotypes and Segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit Area
Abstract
Two opposing hypotheses seek to explain why black-white residential segreration persists despite open housing laws. One perspective argues that discriminatory practices in the marketing of real estate are responsible. Another view contends that it is the preferences of both blacks and whites for their own neighborhoods that maintain segregation. Using data from the Detroit Area Study of 1976 and 1992, the authors test the hypothesis that stereotypes among whites play an important role in explaining their resistance to integrated neighborhoods. They conclude that stereotype use links white preferences to discriminatory real estate practices in a way that helps to explain the persistence of segregation in the Detroit area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A space for place in sociology
Gieryn, T. F. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463 · Cited by 2,370
STEFFENSMEIER, D., ULMER, J., & KRAMER, J. (1998) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x · Cited by 1,592
Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096302 · Cited by 1,562
"Anything But Heavy Metal": Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes
Bryson, B. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096459 · Cited by 1,076
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
“What Group?” Studying Whites and Whiteness in the Era of “Color-Blindness”
Lewis, A. E. (2004) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00237.x · Cited by 643
Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do
Pager, D., & Quillian, L. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000301 · Cited by 640
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428
Racial discrimination, John Henryism, and depression among African Americans
Hudson, D. L., Neighbors, H. W., Geronimus, A. T., & Jackson, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798414567757 · Cited by 345
The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters
Brown, J. R., & Enos, R. D. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01066-z · Cited by 330
Housing and wealth inequality: Racial-ethnic differences in home equity in the United States
Krivo, L. J., & Kaufman, R. L. (2004) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0023 · Cited by 274
Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation
Mummolo, J., & Nall, C. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/687569 · Cited by 269
Hardaway, C. R., & McLoyd, V. C. (2009) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9354-z · Cited by 213
Mcleod, J. D., & Owens, T. J. (2004) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250406700303 · Cited by 184
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Home Ownership and Housing Quality, 1991
Rosenbaum, E. (1996) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3096952 · Cited by 109
Besbris, M., & Faber, J. W. (2017) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12378 · Cited by 101
Darrah, J., & DeLuca, S. (2014) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21758 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 750-780
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2095333261
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
