The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formal and Real Authority in Organizations
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a theory of the allocation of formal authority (the right to decide) and real authority (the effective control over decisions) within organizations, and it illustrates how a formally integrated structure can accommodate various degrees of "real" integration. Real authority is determined by the structure of information, which in turn depends on the allocation of formal authority. An increase in an agent's real authority promotes initiative but results in a loss of control for the principal. After spelling out (some of) the main determinants of the delegation of formal authority within organizations, the paper examines a number of factors that increase the subordinates' real authority in a formally integrated structure: overload, lenient rules, urgency of decision, reputation, performance measurement, and multiplicity of superiors. Finally, the amount of communication in an organization is shown to depend on the allocation of formal authority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Provision of Incentives in Firms
Prendergast, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7 · Cited by 3,338
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00253 · Cited by 2,913
Some Simple Economics of Open Source
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002) · The Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · Cited by 2,355
Self-citationBerger, A. N., Miller, N. H., Petersen, M. A., Rajan, R. G., & Stein, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.003 · Cited by 1,888
Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615 · Cited by 1,848
Self-citationDoes Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization
Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828043052277 · Cited by 1,430
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900
Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing
Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002 · Cited by 540
Trust, growth, and well-being: New evidence and policy implications
Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2014) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53538-2.00002-2 · Cited by 454
Hoffman, M., Kahn, L. B., & Li, D. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx042 · Cited by 261
Analytical Differences in the Economics of Geography: The Case of the Multinational Firm
McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. (2005) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37311 · Cited by 237
Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences
Grossman, Z. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1989 · Cited by 176
Consensus Building: How to Persuade a Group
Caillaud, B., & Tirole, J. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1877 · Cited by 128
Self-citationThe Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2004) · doi:10.3386/w10956 · Cited by 122
Governing cybersecurity from the boardroom: Challenges, drivers, and ways ahead
Gale, M., Bongiovanni, I., & Slapnicar, S. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102840 · Cited by 111
Compliance and the power of authority
Karakostas, A., & Zizzo, D. J. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.016 · Cited by 87
Pricing Models for Online Advertising: CPM vs. CPC
Asdemir, K., Kumar, N., & Jacob, V. S. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0391 · Cited by 78
Power in the Firm and Managerial Career Concerns
Ortega, J. (2003) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00001.x · Cited by 39
Successful organizational change through win-win: How change managers can create mutual benefits
Will, M. G. (2015) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/jaoc-06-2013-0056 · Cited by 35
The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality
Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-07-2019-0050 · Cited by 33
Roehl, U. B. U. (2022) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92644-1_3 · Cited by 26
Investment in Relationship-Specific Assets: Does Finance Matter?
Strieborny, M., & Kukenova, M. (2016) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfv049 · Cited by 26
Bernacchio, C., & Foss, N. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4736313 · Cited by 17
Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory
Miehling, E., Ramamurthy, K. N., Varshney, K. R., Riemer, M., Bouneffouf, D., Richards, J. T., Dhurandhar, A., Daly, E. M., Hind, M., Sattigeri, P., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.00237 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Aghion, P., & Tirole, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2165717995
- Cited by
- 3,046
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 105.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.