Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weak Lensing Analysis of Cl 1358+62 Using Hubble Space Telescope Observations

Open access
Hoekstra, Henk, Franx, Marijn, Kuijken, Konrad, Squires, Gordon·1998·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report on the detection of weak gravitational lensing of faint, distant background objects by Cl 1358+62, a rich cluster of galaxies at a redshift of z = 0.33. The observations consist of a large, multicolor mosaic of Hubble Space T elescope WFPC2 images. The number density of approximately 50 background objects arcmin -2 allows us to do a detailed weak lensing analysis of this cluster. We detect a weak lensing signal out to~1.5 Mpc from the cluster center. The observed distortion is consistent with a singular isothermal sphere model with a velocity dispersion of 780 ± 50 km s -1 . The total projected mass within a radius of 1 Mpc corresponding to this model is (4.4 ± 0.6) × 10 14 M ☉ . The errors given here represent the random error due to the ellipticities of the background galaxies. The uncertainty in the redshift distribution introduces an additional systematic error of ~10% in the weak lensing mass. The weak lensing mass is slightly lower than dynamical estimates and agrees well with X-ray mass estimates. The mass distribution is elongated in a similar way as the light. The axis ratio of 0.30 ± 0.15 and position angle of -21° ± 7° were measured directly from the observations and agree very well with a previous strong lensing determination. A two-dimensional reconstruction of the cluster mass surface density shows that the peak of the mass distribution coincides with the peak of the light distribution. We find a value of (90 ± 13) h 50 M ☉ L for the mass-to-light ratio, consistent with being constant with radius. The point-spread function of HST is highly anisotropic at the edges of the individual chips. This systematically perturbs the shapes of objects, and we present a method for applying the appropriate correction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/306102

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Hoekstra, H., Franx, M., Kuijken, K., & Squires, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1998-09-10
Volume
504
Issue
2
Pages
636-660
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2091357206
Cited by
320
References
32
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak Lensing Analysis of Cl 1358+62 Using Hubble Space Telescope Observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/306102
The paper
Hoekstra, H., Franx, M., Kuijken, K., & Squires, G. (1998). Weak Lensing Analysis of Cl 1358+62 Using Hubble Space Telescope Observations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/306102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.