Cited by 163Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

Candidal Meningitis in Neonates: A 10-Year Review

Fernandez, M., Moylett, E. H., Noyola, D. E., Baker, C. J.·2000·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Candidal meningitis may complicate systemic candidiasis in the premature neonate. We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of 106 cases of systemic candidiasis in neonates to define the incidence, clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcome of candidal meningitis. Twenty-three of the 106 neonates had candidal meningitis (0.4% of admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit). The median gestational age was 26.2 weeks, the median birth weight was 820 g, and the median age at the onset of illness was 8 days. Clinical disease was severe and commonly was manifested by respiratory decompensation. Findings of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses varied: pleocytosis was inconsistent, hypoglycorrhachia was common, gram staining was uniformly negative, and Candida was isolated from 17 neonates (74%). Each infant was treated with amphotericin B (median cumulative dose, 30 mg/kg); 5 also received flucytosine therapy. In conclusion, initial clinical features of candidal meningitis are indistinguishable from those of other causes of systemic infection in premature neonates, and normal CSF parameters do not exclude meningitis. Timely initiation of amphotericin B monotherapy was associated with an excellent outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/313973

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Candida meningitis often follows candidemia in newborn infants and has a high propensity for relapse.

    “Candida meningitis often follows candidemia in newborn infants [234] and has a high propensity for relapse.”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [234]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandez, M., Moylett, E. H., Noyola, D. E., & Baker, C. J.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, C. J.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
458-463
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2104856050
Cited by
163
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
systemic candidiasis, preterm infants, amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, cerebrospinal fluid findings, hypoglycorrhachia, respiratory decompensation, incidence, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Male, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Meningitis, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review