The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring Developmental Modularity from Morphological Integration: Analysis of Individual Variation and Asymmetry in Bumblebee Wings
Abstract
Organisms are built from distinct modules, which are internally coherent but flexible in their relationships among one another. We examined morphological variation within and between two candidate modules: the fore- and hindwings of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus empatiens). We used the techniques of geometric morphometrics (Procrustes superimposition) to analyze the variation of landmark configurations in fore- and hindwings. Regression was used to correct for size-related shape variation (allometry). Principal component analysis revealed patterns of variation that were remarkably similar for individual variation and fluctuating asymmetry (FA). Because covariation of FA among parts must be due to direct transmission of the developmental perturbations causing FA, this agreement of patterns suggests that much of individual variation is also due to direct developmental interactions within each developing wing. Moreover, partial least squares analysis indicated that the patterns of shape covariation between fore- and hindwings were nearly the same as the patterns of within-wing variation. Shape covariation of FA was only found in bees that had been reared under elevated CO(2) concentration but not in bees from the control treatment, suggesting that the mechanisms of developmental interactions between fore- and hindwings are related to gas exchange. We conclude that the fore- and hindwings are developmental modules that maintain internal coherence through direct developmental interactions and are connected to each other only by relatively few links that use the system of interactions within modules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Goodall, C. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488412 · Cited by 8,675
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology
Bookstein, F. L. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511573064 · Cited by 4,365
Edgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Edgington, E. S. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess2169 · Cited by 2,028
Journal of Agricultural Research
(2023) · Journal of Agricultural Research, Pakistan · doi:10.58475/jar · Cited by 2,006
PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x · Cited by 1,914
FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns
Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C. (1986) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002135 · Cited by 1,701
The International Journal of Developmental Biology
Aréchaga, J. (2012) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1,273
Asymmetry, Developmental Stability, and Evolution
Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198548959.001.0001 · Cited by 1,272
Cited by
Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry
Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationMorphological integration and developmental modularity
Klingenberg, C. P. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110054 · Cited by 863
Self-citationKlingenberg, C. P., & Marugán-Lobón, J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt025 · Cited by 415
Self-citationThe macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time
Goswami, A., Smaers, J. B., Soligo, C., & Polly, P. D. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0254 · Cited by 359
Klingenberg, C. P., Mebus, K., & Auffray, J. (2003) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2003.03057.x · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingenberg, C. P., Badyaev, A. V., Sowry, S. M., & Beckwith, N. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-23
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2144663154
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Developmental Modularity from Morphological Integration: Analysis of Individual Variation and Asymmetry in Bumblebee Wings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317002
- The paper
- Klingenberg, C. P., Badyaev, A. V., Sowry, S. M., & Beckwith, N. J. (2001). Inferring Developmental Modularity from Morphological Integration: Analysis of Individual Variation and Asymmetry in Bumblebee Wings. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/317002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.