Cited by 331Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Voriconazole and Fluconazole in the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis in Immunocompromised Patients

Open access
Ally, R., Schürmann, D., Kreisel, W., Carosi, G., Aguirrebengoa, K., Dupont, B., Hodges, M., Troke, P. +2 more·2001·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of voriconazole and fluconazole were compared in 391 immunocompromised patients with mycology- and biopsy-proven esophageal candidiasis. Primary efficacy analysis (256 patients) of esophageal treatment as assessed by esophagoscopy revealed success rates of 98.3% with voriconazole and 95.1% with fluconazole. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in success rates ranged from -1.0% to 7.5%. The overall safety and tolerability of both antifungals were acceptable. Fewer patients discontinued voriconazole treatment because of insufficient clinical response (4 patients [2.0%] vs. 5 patients [2.6%]). More patients discontinued voriconazole than fluconazole treatment because of laboratory test abnormalities (7 patients [3.5%] vs. 2 patients [1.0%]) or treatment-related adverse events (5 patients [2.5%] vs. 1 patient [0.5%]). The most frequent adverse events (23%) with voriconazole were mild, transient visual disturbances. Voriconazole (200 mg, b.i.d.) was shown to be at least as effective as fluconazole in the treatment of biopsy-proven esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/322653

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voriconazole is as active as fluconazole against esophageal candidiasis, although it was associated with more adverse events in a recent study.

    “It is as active as fluconazole against esophageal candidiasis, although it was associated with more adverse events in a recent study [46].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Voriconazole is as efficacious as fluconazole for esophageal candidiasis but is associated with a higher rate of treatment-related adverse events.

    “Voriconazole (200 mg b.i.d. for a median duration of 14 days) is as efficacious as fluconazole (400 mg loading dose followed by 200 mg/day for a median duration of 15 days) but is associated with a higher rate of treatment-related adverse events [46].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Troke PF, Brammer KW, Hitchcock CA, et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: activity in systemic candidiasis models and early clinical efficacy in oropharyngeal candidiasis [abstract F73]. In: Proceedings and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Che- motherapy (San Francisco). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:125.
  2. Jones JH, Allen R, Vu T, et al. Use of voriconazole to treat invasive fungal infections in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients [poster abstract 244]. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:1005.
  3. Patterson BE, Coates PE. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: pharmacokinetics in man [abstract F78]. In: Proceedings and abstracts of the 35th Inter- science Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (San Francisco). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995: 128.
  4. Denning D, Del Favero A, Gluckman E, et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: clinical efficacy in acute invasive aspergillosis [abstract F80]. In: Pro- gram and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimi- crobial Agents and Chemotherapy (San Francisco). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  5. Dupont B, Denning D, Lode H, et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide- spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: clinical efficacy in chronic invasive aspergillosis [abstract F81]. In: Pro- gram and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimi- crobial Agents and Chemotherapy (San Francisco). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:127.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ally, R., Schürmann, D., Kreisel, W., Carosi, G., Aguirrebengoa, K., Dupont, B., Hodges, M., Troke, P., Romero, A. J., & the Esophageal Candidiasis Study Group
Affiliations
  • Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (ZA)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Hospital de Cruces (ES)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Dupont, B.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2001-11
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1447-1454
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2027962943
Cited by
331
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
20.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
esophageal candidiasis, voriconazole, fluconazole, immunocompromised patients, antifungal therapy, treatment efficacy, adverse events, visual disturbances, esophagoscopy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Consumer Product Safety, Double-Blind Method, Esophageal Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Pyrimidines, Triazoles, Fluconazole, Immunocompromised Host, Treatment Outcome, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review