The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Far Do Animals Go? Determinants of Day Range in Mammals
Abstract
Day range (daily distance traveled) is an important measure for understanding relationships between animal distributions and food resources. However, our understanding of variation in day range across species is limited. Here we present a day range model and compare predictions against a comprehensive analysis of mammalian day range. As found in previous studies, day range scales near the 1/4 power of body mass. Also, consistent with model predictions, taxonomic groups differ in the way day range scales with mass, associated with the most common diet types and foraging habitats. Faunivores have the longest day ranges and steepest body mass scaling. Frugivores and herbivores show intermediate and low scaling exponents, respectively. Day range in primates did not scale with mass, which may be consistent with the prediction that three-dimensional foraging habitats lead to lower exponents. Day ranges increase with group size in carnivores but not in other taxonomic groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey, and use large day ranges to hunt.
“Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey (e.g. small ungulates; Cusack et al., 2015; Kays et al., 2011), and use large day ranges to hunt (Carbone, Cowlishaw, Isaac, & Rowcliffe, 2005).”
From Forest terrains influence walking kinematics among indigenous Tsimane of the Bolivian Amazon (2022) · cites this paper as Carbone et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Kleiber, M. (1932) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315 · Cited by 2,222
The African Wild Dog: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation
Creel, S., & Creel, N. M. (2002) · doi:10.1515/9780691207001 · Cited by 547
Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges
Haskell, J. P., Ritchie, M. E., & Olff, H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00840 · Cited by 354
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1023/A:1018430201230 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0006323199005307 · DOI
- Bourliere F., The natural history of mammals
- 10.1093/beheco/11.4.452 · DOI
- Brown J. H., University of Chicago Press
- Calder W. A., Consequences of body size for avian energetics. Pages 85–151 in R
- 10.1126/science.1067994 · DOI
- 10.1038/46266 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.232715699 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1997.0481 · DOI
- 10.1038/290699a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01990.x · DOI
- 10.1038/365748a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1982.tb01082.x · DOI
- 10.1086/284369 · DOI
- 10.1038/25977 · DOI
- 10.2307/5968 · DOI
- 10.1086/284084 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00790026 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00296396 · DOI
- 10.2307/2389846 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00317422 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1102138 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00149.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0337:ECATRB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1086/320621 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00030.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1056346 · DOI
- Mace G. M., Vertebrate home range size and energetic requirements. Pages 32–53 in I
- 10.1086/303405 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1997.0480 · DOI
- 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078 · DOI
- Purvis A., 1995, Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 11, 247
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · DOI · Paper page
- Ricklefs R. E., The economy of nature
- 10.1086/284596 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00790027 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0436428100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00173778 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garland, T., Schutz, H., Chappell, M. A., Keeney, B. K., Meek, T. H., Copes, L. E., Acosta, W., Drenowatz, C., Maciel, R. C., van Dijk, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.048397 · Cited by 444
The legacy of the Pleistocene megafauna extinctions on nutrient availability in Amazonia
Doughty, C. E., Wolf, A., & Malhi, Y. (2013) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1895 · Cited by 211
Nonlinear scaling of space use in human hunter–gatherers
Hamilton, M. J., Milne, B. T., Walker, R. S., & Brown, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611197104 · Cited by 130
Lateral Diffusion of Nutrients by Mammalian Herbivores in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Wolf, A., Doughty, C. E., & Malhi, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071352 · Cited by 120
“Data collected for this study include longevity, fecundity and metabolic rate from the AnAge database [24]; population density [25]; day range [26]; and home range [27], all of which include M as a predictor variable, as well as a dataset of M per se [28], which was used preferentially if available for a taxon.”
MethodGreat ranging associated with greater reproductive investment in mammals.
Pontzer, H., & Kamilar, J. M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806105106 · Cited by 61
Forest terrains influence walking kinematics among indigenous Tsimane of the Bolivian Amazon
Holowka, N. B., Kraft, T. S., Wallace, I. J., Gurven, M., & Venkataraman, V. V. (2022) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2022.13 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Carbone, C., Cowlishaw, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Rowcliffe, J. M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-297
- ISSN
- 0003-0147
- 1537-5323
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review