Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Far Do Animals Go? Determinants of Day Range in Mammals

Carbone, Chris, Cowlishaw, Guy, Isaac, Nick J. B., Rowcliffe, J. Marcus·2005·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Day range (daily distance traveled) is an important measure for understanding relationships between animal distributions and food resources. However, our understanding of variation in day range across species is limited. Here we present a day range model and compare predictions against a comprehensive analysis of mammalian day range. As found in previous studies, day range scales near the 1/4 power of body mass. Also, consistent with model predictions, taxonomic groups differ in the way day range scales with mass, associated with the most common diet types and foraging habitats. Faunivores have the longest day ranges and steepest body mass scaling. Frugivores and herbivores show intermediate and low scaling exponents, respectively. Day range in primates did not scale with mass, which may be consistent with the prediction that three-dimensional foraging habitats lead to lower exponents. Day ranges increase with group size in carnivores but not in other taxonomic groups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426790

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey, and use large day ranges to hunt.

    “Carnivores and large-bodied predators use trails more than other animals, including their prey (e.g. small ungulates; Cusack et al., 2015; Kays et al., 2011), and use large day ranges to hunt (Carbone, Cowlishaw, Isaac, & Rowcliffe, 2005).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1023/A:1018430201230 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0006323199005307 · DOI
  3. Bourliere F., The natural history of mammals
  4. 10.1093/beheco/11.4.452 · DOI
  5. Brown J. H., University of Chicago Press
  6. Calder W. A., Consequences of body size for avian energetics. Pages 85–151 in R
  7. 10.1126/science.1067994 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/46266 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.232715699 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0481 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/290699a0 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01990.x · DOI
  13. 10.1038/365748a0 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1982.tb01082.x · DOI
  15. 10.1086/284369 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/25977 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/5968 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/284084 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/BF00790026 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF00296396 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/2389846 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/BF00317422 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.1102138 · DOI
  26. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00149.x · DOI
  27. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0337:ECATRB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/320621 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00030.x · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1056346 · DOI
  31. Mace G. M., Vertebrate home range size and energetic requirements. Pages 32–53 in I
  32. 10.1086/303405 · DOI
  33. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0480 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078 · DOI
  36. Purvis A., 1995, Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 11, 247
  37. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ricklefs R. E., The economy of nature
  39. 10.1086/284596 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/BF00790027 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.0436428100 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/BF00173778 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carbone, C., Cowlishaw, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Rowcliffe, J. M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2005-02
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
290-297
ISSN
  • 0003-0147
  • 1537-5323
Cited by
196
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review