Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dark Matter Substructure and Gamma‐Ray Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo

Open access
Diemand, Jurg, Kuhlen, Michael, Madau, Piero·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present initial results from "Via Lactea," the highest resolution simulation to date of Galactic CDM substructure. It follows the formation of a Milky Way-sized halo with M halo = 1.8 × 10 12 M ☉ in a WMAP three-year cosmology, using 234 million particles. Over 10,000 subhalos can be identified at z = 0: their cumulative mass function is well-fit by N (> M sub ) = 0.0064 ( M sub / M halo ) -1 down to M sub = 4 × 10 6 M ☉ . The total mass fraction in subhalos is 5.3%, while the fraction of surface mass density in substructure within a projected distance of 10 kpc from the halo center is 0.3%. Because of the significant contribution from the smallest resolved subhalos, these fractions have not converged yet. Sub-substructure is apparent in all the larger satellites, and a few dark matter lumps are resolved even in the solar vicinity. The number of dark satellites with peak circular velocities above 10 km s -1 (5 km s -1 ) is 124 (812): of these, five (26) are found within 0.1 r vir , a region that appeared practically smooth in previous simulations. The neutralino self-annihilation γ-ray emission from dark matter clumps is approximately constant per subhalo mass decade. Therefore, while in our run the contribution of substructure to the γ-ray luminosity of the Galactic halo amounts to only 40% of the total spherically averaged smooth signal, we expect this fraction to grow significantly as resolution is increased further. An all-sky map of the expected annihilation γ-ray flux reaching a fiducial observer at 8 kpc from the Galactic center shows that at the current resolution a small number of subhalos start to be bright enough to be visible against the background from the smooth density field surrounding the observer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/510736

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Diemand, J., Kuhlen, M., & Madau, P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-03
Volume
657
Issue
1
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1992240055
Cited by
447
References
50
FWCI
46.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark Matter Substructure and Gamma‐Ray Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/510736
The paper
Diemand, J., Kuhlen, M., & Madau, P. (2007). Dark Matter Substructure and Gamma‐Ray Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/510736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.