Cited by 93Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Growth, Development, and Life History throughout the Evolution of Homo

Schwartz, Gary T.·2012·Current Anthropology

Abstract

For over a century, paleoanthropologists have listed the presence of prolonged periods of gestation, growth, and maturation, extremely short interbirth intervals, and early weaning among the key features that distinguish modern humans from our extant ape cousins. Exactly when and how this particular scheduling of important developmental milestones—termed a “life history profile”—came to characterize Homo sapiens is not entirely clear. Researchers have suggested that the modern human life history profile appeared either at the base of the hominin radiation (ca. 6 Ma), with the origins of the genus Homo (ca. 2.5 Ma), or much later in time, perhaps only with H. sapiens (ca. 200–100 Ka). In this short review, evidence of the pace of growth and maturation in fossil australopiths and early members of Homo is detailed to evaluate the merits of each of these scenarios. New data on the relationship between dental development and life history in extant apes are synthesized within the context of life history theory and developmental variation across modern human groups. Future directions, including new analytical tools for extracting more refined life history parameters as well as integrative biomechanical and developmental models of facial growth are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/667591

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on fossil dental specimens, australopithecines resembled wild chimpanzees, not modern humans, in life-history stages.

    “Based on fossil dental specimens, australopithecined resembled wild chimpanzees, not modern humans, in life-history stages (57).”

    From Emerging Adulthood, a Pre-adult Life-History Stage (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 133 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, G. T.
Corresponding author
Schwartz, Gary T.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2012-12
Volume
53
Issue
S6
Pages
S395-S408
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2020984809
Cited by
93
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
49.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
human life history, Homo evolution, australopiths, growth and maturation, tooth development, weaning, birth interval, gestation, hominin evolution, developmental variation, facial growth, life history theory, apes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review