CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,698Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1.

Belk, Russell W.·2013·Journal of Consumer Research
DOI 10.1086/671052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The extended self was proposed in 1988. Since it was formulated, many technological changes have dramatically affected the way we consume, present ourselves, and communicate. This conceptual update seeks to revitalize the concept, incorporate the impacts of digitization, and provide an understanding of consumer sense of self in today's technological environment. It is necessarily a work in progress, for the digital environment and our behavior within it continue to evolve. But some important changes are already clear. Five changes with digital consumption are considered that impact the nature of self and the nature of possessions. Needed modifications and additions to the extended self are outlined, and directions for future research are suggested. The digital world opens a host of new means for self-extension, using many new consumption objects to reach a vastly broader audience. Even though this calls for certain reformulations, the basic concept of the extended self remains vital.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/671052

Cites

214 of 214 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 218 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. ——— (1995), Collecting in a Consumer Society, London: Routledge.
  2. ——— (2010), “Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (1), 715–34.
  3. Benjamin, Walter (1930/1968), “Unpacking My Library: A Talk about Book Collecting,” in Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn, San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace & World, 59–67.
  4. Binark, Mutlu, and Günseli Sütcü (2009), “Practicing Identity in the Digital Game World: The Turkish Tribes’ Community Practices in ‘Silkroad Online,’” in Digital Technologies of the Self, ed. Yasmine Abbas and Fred Dervin, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 61–83.
  5. boyd, danah (2010), “Friendship,” in Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out, ed. Mizuko Ito et al., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 79–115.
  6. Cova, Bernard, Robert V. Kozinets, and Avi Shankar, eds. (2007), Consumer Tribes, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  7. Coyne, Richard (2005), Cornucopia Limited, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Dean, Jodi (2010), Blog Theory, Cambridge: Polity.
  9. Fowler, Geoffrey (2013), “Life and Death Online: Who Controls a Digital Legacy?” Wall Street Journal, January 5, A3.
  10. Hartman, Cathy L., and Pamela L. Kiecker (1991), “Marketplace Influencers at the Point of Purchase: The Role of Purchase Pals in Consumer Decision Making,” in 1991 AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 461–69.
  11. Hillis, Ken, and Michael Petit, eds. (2006), Everyday on eBay: Culture, Collecting, and Desire, New York: Routledge.
  12. Horst, Heather A., Becky Herr-Stephenson, and Laura Robinson (2010), “Media Ecologies,” in Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out, ed. Mizuko Ito et al., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 29–78.
  13. Ihde, Don (2002), Bodies in Technology, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Lehdonvirta, Vili (2009), Virtual Consumption, PhD dissertation, Turku School of Economics, Turku, Finland: A-11:2009, online version, http://vili.lehdonvirta.com/files/thes3988/Virtual-Consumption-thesis.html.
  15. MacCallum-Stewart, Ester, and Justin Parsler (2008), “Role-Play vs. Gameplay: The Difficulties of Playing a Role in World of Warcraft,” in Digital Culture, Play, and Identity: A World of Warcraft Reader, ed. Hilde G. Corneliussen and Jill Walker Rettberg, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225–46.
  16. Mauco, Oliver (2009), “The Ideology of the Self in Ludic Digital Worlds,” in Digital Technologies of the Self, ed. Yasmine Abbas and Fred Dervin, Newcastle upon Tyme: Cambridge Scholars, 109–23.
  17. Napolitano, Todd (1996), “Of Graphomania, Confession, and the Writing Self,” Electronic Book Review, 3, http://www.altx.com/ebr/reviews/rev3/todd.htm.
  18. Renov, Michael (1996), “Video Confessions,” in Resolutions: Contemporary Video Practices, ed. Michael Renov and Erika Suderburg, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 78–101.
  19. Rettberg, Jill (2008), Blogging, Cambridge: Polity.
  20. Richtel, Matt (2012), “Young, in Love and Sharing Everything, Including a Password,” New York Times, January 17, online edition.
  21. Ridley, Matt (2012), “Internet On, Inhibitions Off: Why We Tell All,” Wall Street Journal, February 18, online edition.
  22. Ruvio, Ayalla, and Russell Belk (2012), “Conflicting Selves and the Role of Possessions: A Process View of Transgenders’ Self-Identity Conflict,” in Identity and Consumption, ed. Ayalla Ruvio and Russell Belk, London: Routledge, 141–48.
  23. Siddiqui, Shakeel, and Darach Turley (2006), “Extending the Self in a Digital World,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, ed. Connine Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 647–48.
  24. Stross, Randall (2012), “Meet Your Neighbors, If Only Online,” New York Times, May 12, online edition.
  25. Sullentrop, Chris, and Stephen Totilo (2012), “Gaming Faces Its Archenemy: Financial Reality,” New York Times, online edition, October 3.
  26. Tedeschi, Bob (2007), “E-commerce Report: Meet Your Neighbors, but Just Not in Person,” New York Times, October 22, online edition.
  27. Tronstad, Ragnhild (2008), “Character Identification in World of Warcraft: The Relationship between Capacity and Appearance,” in Digital Culture, Play, and Identity, ed. Hilde G. Corneliussen and Jill Walker Rettberg, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 249–63.
  28. ——— (2012b), “Attachment to Virtual Possessions in Videogames,” in Research in Consumer Behavior, ed. Russell Belk, Søren Askegaard, and Linda Scott, Vol. 14, Bingley: Emerald Group, 153–70. · DOI
  29. Yee, Nick (2007), “The Proteus Effect: Behavioral Modification via Transformations of Digital Self Representation,” PhD dissertation, Department of Communications, Stanford University, http://www.nickyee.com/pubs/Dissertation_Nick_Yee.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,698

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Belk, R. W.
Corresponding author
Belk, Russell W.
ORCID
Belk, Russell W.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
477-500
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
DOI
10.1086/671052
OpenAlex
W2154467650
Cited by
1,698
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 191 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 157 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 9
FWCI
200.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
extended self, consumer self-concept, digitization, digital consumption, self-extension, self-presentation, digital communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review