Modern Police Tactics, Police-Citizen Interactions, and the Prospects for Reform
Abstract
High-profile incidents of police misconduct have led to widespread calls for law enforcement reform. But prior studies cast doubt on whether police commanders can control officers, and offer few policy remedies because of their focus on potentially immutable officer traits like personality. I advance an alternative, institutional perspective and demonstrate that police officers—sometimes characterized as autonomous—are highly responsive to managerial directives. Using millions of records of police-citizen interactions alongside officer interviews, I evaluate the impact of a change to the protocol for stopping criminal suspects on police performance. An interrupted time series analysis shows the directive produced an immediate increase in the rate of stops producing evidence of the suspected crime. Interviewed officers said the order signaled increased managerial scrutiny, leading them to adopt more conservative tactics. Procedural changes can quickly and dramatically alter officer behavior, suggesting a reform strategy sometimes forestalled by psychological and personality-driven accounts of police reform.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981 · see citing works
Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research
Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804564 · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Goldstein, J. (1960) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/794445 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy
Goel, S., Rao, J. M., & Shroff, R. (2016) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas897 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
The Effects of Local Police Surges on Crime and Arrests in New York City
MacDonald, J., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157223 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States
Pierson, E., Simoiu, C., Overgoor, J., Corbett-Davies, S., Jenson, D., Shoemaker, A., Ramachandran, V., Barghouty, P., Phillips, C., Shroff, R., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0858-1 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing
KNOX, D., LOWE, W., & MUMMOLO, J. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000039 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Self-citationMilitarization fails to enhance police safety or reduce crime but may harm police reputation
Mummolo, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805161115 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationNo Justice, No Peace: Political Science Perspectives on the American Carceral State
Harris, A. P., Walker, H. L., & Eckhouse, L. (2020) · The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2020.21 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Adams, I. T., McCrain, J., Schiff, D. S., Schiff, K. J., & Mourtgos, S. M. (2025) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22620 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Braga, A. A., MacDonald, J. M., & McCabe, J. E. (2024) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12679 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A political-economic model of police administration
Clark, T. S. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/729933 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mummolo, J.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mummolo, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Mummolo, Jonathan
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2773280584
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 53.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- police tactics, police-citizen interaction, police misconduct, law enforcement reform, police autonomy, police command, stop and frisk, procedural change, police performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review