Cited by 94Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

The group basis of partisan affective polarization

Open access
Robison, Joshua, Moskowitz, Rachel L.·2019·The Journal of Politics

Abstract

What explains rising partisan animosity in the United States? We argue that mass partisans’ feelings toward the social group coalitions of the parties are an important cause of rising affective polarization. We first leverage evidence from the American National Election Study (ANES) Time Series to show that partisans’ feelings toward the social groups linked to their in-party (out-party) have grown more positive (negative) over time. We then turn to the 1992–96 and 2000–2004 ANES Panel Surveys to disentangle the interrelationship between partisan polarization and social group evaluations. Individuals with more polarized social group evaluations in 1992 or 2000 report substantially more polarized party thermometer ratings and more extreme, and better sorted, partisan identities four years later. Notably, these variables exerted little reciprocal influence on group evaluations. Our study has important implications for understanding affective polarization and the role of social groups in public opinion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/703069

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • That shift heightened the salience of the historic power of social groups sorted into the Republican party-white, men, Christians-and partisan social groups' impact on affective polarization.

    “That shift heightened the salience of the historic power of social groups sorted into the Republican party-white, men, Christians-and partisan social groups' impact on affective polarization (Robison & Moskowitz, 2019).”

    From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Robison & Moskowitz, 2019

    The title in our copy, “The Group Basis of Partisan Affective Polarization,” supports a broad connection between groups and affective polarization. The available passages do not address a shift in salience, the historic power of white people, men, or Christians, or their sorting into the Republican Party. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robison, J., & Moskowitz, R. L.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
The Journal of Politics
Published
2019-07
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
1075-1079
ISSN
  • 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2508
OpenAlex
W2962036323
Cited by
94
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
FWCI
39.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Political Science Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
affective polarization, partisan animosity, party identification, public opinion, American National Election Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review