Cited by 109Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States

Westwood, Sean J., Peterson, Erik·2022·Political Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Westwood, Sean J.
Venue
Political Behavior
Published
2020-10-08
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
1125-1147
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
OpenAlex
W2979448203
Cited by
108
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
FWCI
49.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Facebook
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
partisan affect, affective polarization, racial animus, outgroup attitudes, political attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review