The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups
Abstract
Data from a voluntary association are used to construct a new formal model for a traditional anthropological problem, fission in small groups. The process leading to fission is viewed as an unequal flow of sentiments and information across the ties in a social network. This flow is unequal because it is uniquely constrained by the contextual range and sensitivity of each relationship in the network. The subsequent differential sharing of sentiments leads to the formation of subgroups with more internal stability than the group as a whole, and results in fission. The Ford-Fulkerson labeling algorithm allows an accurate prediction of membership in the subgroups and of the locus of the fission to be made from measurements of the potential for information flow across each edge in the network. Methods for measurement of potential information flow are discussed, and it is shown that all appropriate techniques will generate the same predictions. THE PROBLEM OF HOW and why fission takes place in small bounded groups has long been a central issue in social anthropology, even though the small groups studied have often been described under some other rubric, such as kinship. Fission in kinship groups has been studied from a variety of perspectives, especially those of descent theory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Resolution limit in community detection
Fortunato, S., & Barthélemy, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605965104 · Cited by 3,024
Cited by
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
DeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks
Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184819 · Cited by 2,123
Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks
Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.016107 · Cited by 2,025
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2162 · Cited by 787
Evidence for hubs in human functional brain networks
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., & Petersen, S. E. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.035 · Cited by 716
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Classification
Zhuang, C., & Ma, Q. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186116 · Cited by 423
Robustness of community structure in networks
Karrer, B., Levina, E., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.046119 · Cited by 350
Quantifying controversy on social media
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3140565 · Cited by 348
Modularity clustering is force-directed layout
Noack, A. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.79.026102 · Cited by 258
How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in social media?
De Choudhury, M., Lin, Y.-R., Sundaram, H., Candan, K. S., Xie, L., & Kelliher, A. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14024 · Cited by 209
Quantum Optimization and Quantum Learning: A Survey
Li, Y., Tian, M., Liu, G., Peng, C., & Jiao, L. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970105 · Cited by 177
Network Analysis Reveals Increased Integration during Emotional and Motivational Processing
Kinnison, J., Padmala, S., Choi, J.-M., & Pessoa, L. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0821-12.2012 · Cited by 153
Quantifying Controversy in Social Media
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2835776.2835792 · Cited by 147
“However, how well does it generalize to datasets from different domains? We obtain a comprehensive group of datasets kindly shared by authors of previous works: Political blogs, links between blogs discussing politics in the US [1]; Twitter politics, Twitter messages pertaining to the 2010 midterm election in US [8];…”
BackgroundDetecting hierarchical genome folding with network modularity
Norton, H. K., Emerson, D. J., Huang, H., Kim, J., Titus, K. R., Gu, S., Bassett, D. S., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4560 · Cited by 146
Wang, Y., Di, Z., & Fan, Y. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/1935b388-2831-4fb1-b8f2-914ab91c1ddc · Cited by 130
A Monte Carlo evaluation of weighted community detection algorithms
Gates, K. M., Henry, T., Steinley, D., & Fair, D. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00045 · Cited by 106
“…been used to examine the organization of networks across disparate research foci, including the World Wide Web (Latora and Marchiori, 2001), social networks (Zachary, 1977), the power grid (Watts and Strogatz, 1998), brain processes (Bassett and Bullmore, 2006), and food-webs (Dunne et al., 2002).”
BackgroundSocial goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies
McAvoy, A., Allen, B., & Nowak, M. A. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2 · Cited by 94
Detecting multiple communities using quantum annealing on the D-Wave system
Negre, C. F. A., Ushijima-Mwesigwa, H., & Mniszewski, S. M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227538 · Cited by 80
Community Detection in Quantum Complex Networks
Faccin, M., Migdał, P., Johnson, T. H., Bergholm, V., & Biamonte, J. D. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.041012 · Cited by 43
Opinion dynamics with backfire effect and biased assimilation
Chen, X., Tsaparas, P., Lijffijt, J., & De Bie, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256922 · Cited by 39
Wang, T., Peng, Q., Liu, B., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00418 · Cited by 27
Connelly, E., del Genio, C. I., & Harrison, F. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03136-19 · Cited by 27
Quantum walks on complex networks with connection instabilities and community structure
Tsomokos, D. I. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052315 · Cited by 18
Quantum-Assisted Joint Multi-Objective Routing and Load Balancing for Socially-Aware Networks
Alanis, D., Hu, J., Botsinis, P., Babar, Z., Ng, S. X., & Hanzo, L. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2629671 · Cited by 15
Quantifying Controversy in Social Media
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2015) · arXiv · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Zachary, W. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Research
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1977-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 452-473
- ISSN
- 0038-4801 (ISSN-L)
- 0091-7710
- 2153-3806
- OpenAlex
- W3101413764
- Cited by
- 4,704
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
