Cited by 56Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IS THERE A METALLICITY CEILING TO FORM CARBON STARS?—A NOVEL TECHNIQUE REVEALS A SCARCITY OF C STARS IN THE INNER M31 DISK

Open access

Abstract

We use medium-band near-infrared (NIR) Hubble Space Telescope WFC3 photometry with model NIR spectra of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars to develop a new tool for efficiently distinguishing carbon-rich (C-type) AGB stars from oxygen-rich (M-type) AGB stars in galaxies at the edge of and outside the Local Group. We present the results of a test of this method on a region of the inner disk of M31, where we find a surprising lack of C stars, contrary to the findings of previous C star searches in other regions of M31. We find only one candidate C star (plus up to six additional, less certain C star candidates), resulting in an extremely low ratio of C to M stars ( ) that is one to two orders of magnitude lower than other C/M estimates in M31. The low C/M ratio is likely due to the high metallicity in this region which impedes stars from achieving C/O > 1 in their atmospheres. These observations provide stringent constraints to evolutionary models of metal-rich AGB stars and suggest that there is a metallicity threshold above which M stars are unable to make the transition to C stars, dramatically affecting AGB mass loss and dust production and, consequently, the observed global properties of metal-rich galaxies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/774/1/83

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1051/0004-6361/200911703 · DOI
  2. Azzopardi, 1991, A&AS, 88, 265
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10184.x · DOI
  4. Barmby, 2006, ApJL, 650, L45, 10.1086/508626 · DOI
  5. Barmby, 2000, AJ, 119, 727, 10.1086/301213 · DOI
  6. 10.1051/0004-6361:20041565 · DOI
  7. 10.1051/0004-6361:200810619 · DOI
  8. Battinelli, 2003, AJ, 125, 1298, 10.1086/346274 · DOI
  9. 10.1051/0004-6361:20077760 · DOI
  10. Boyer, 2009, ApJ, 697, 1993, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1993 · DOI
  11. Boyer, 2012, ApJ, 748, 40, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/40 · DOI
  12. Boyer, 2011, AJ, 142, 103, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/103 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/117466 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/118030 · DOI
  15. 10.1051/0004-6361:20053933 · DOI
  16. Conroy, 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Courteau, 2011, ApJ, 739, 20, 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/20 · DOI
  18. Dalcanton, 2012, ApJS, 200, 18, 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/18 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dalcanton, 2012, ApJS, 198, 6, 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/6 · DOI
  20. Davidge, 2005, AJ, 129, 201, 10.1086/426563 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/316630 · DOI
  22. Dorman, 2012, ApJ, 752, 147, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/147 · DOI
  23. 10.1086/190997 · DOI
  24. Feast, 2007, Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars: Their Importance as Actors and Probes, 479
  25. 10.1051/0004-6361:20041198 · DOI
  26. 10.1086/168518 · DOI
  27. 10.1086/165535 · DOI
  28. Girardi, 2010, ApJ, 724, 1030, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1030 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/11604792 · DOI
  30. 10.1051/0004-6361:20054163 · DOI
  31. Groenewegen, 2007, Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars: Their Importance as Actors and Probes, 433
  32. 10.1051/0004-6361/200912678 · DOI
  33. Hook, 2008, STECF, 44, 11
  34. 10.1093/mnras/stt640 · DOI
  35. 10.1051/0004-6361:20010285 · DOI
  36. 10.1071/AS02013 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Krist, 1995, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, 349
  38. Maraston, 2006, ApJ, 652, 85, 10.1086/508143 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1051/0004-6361:20000247 · DOI
  40. 10.1051/0004-6361/200912598 · DOI
  41. Marigo, 2013, MNRAS
  42. 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Marigo, 2010, Stellar Populations-Planning for the Next Decade, 36
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08417.x · DOI
  45. Massey, 2003, AJ, 126, 2867, 10.1086/379558 · DOI
  46. Melbourne, 2013, ApJ, 764, 30, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/30 · DOI
  47. Melbourne, 2012, ApJ, 748, 47, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/47 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/mnras/stt673 · DOI
  49. Nikolaev, 2000, ApJ, 542, 804, 10.1086/317048 · DOI
  50. 10.1051/0004-6361/201220335 · DOI
  51. 10.1051/0004-6361:20000463 · DOI
  52. Olsen, 2006, AJ, 132, 271, 10.1086/504900 · DOI
  53. Olsen, 2011, ApJ, 737, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/29 · DOI
  54. Rayner, 2009, ApJS, 185, 289, 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/289 · DOI
  55. Riebel, 2012, ApJ, 753, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/71 · DOI
  56. 10.1086/162827 · DOI
  57. Rowe, 2005, AJ, 129, 729, 10.1086/427247 · DOI
  58. 10.1051/0004-6361/200912805 · DOI
  59. 10.1051/0004-6361/201118365 · DOI
  60. Stephens, 2003, AJ, 125, 2473, 10.1086/374570 · DOI
  61. 10.1051/0004-6361:20042555 · DOI
  62. Ventura, 2001, ApJL, 550, L65, 10.1086/319496 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1007/978-94-011-0922-2 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22075.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boyer, M. L., Girardi, L., Marigo, P., Williams, B. F., Aringer, B., Nowotny, W., Rosenfield, P., Dorman, C. E., Guhathakurta, P., Dalcanton, J. J., Melbourne, J. L., Olsen, K. A. G., & Weisz, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US)
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Boyer, M. L.
  • Olsen, K. A. G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
774
Issue
1
Pages
83
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2138551806
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555)
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, GO-12055, 26555)
  • Austrian Science Fund (P21988)
  • Università degli Studi di Padova
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (NAS5-26555)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
carbon stars, M31, asymptotic giant branch stars, C/O ratio, AGB mass loss, dust formation, stellar evolution models, near-infrared photometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review