Cited by 50Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS MASQUERADING AS YOUNG STELLAR OBJECTS IN THE CENTRAL MOLECULAR ZONE

Open access
Koepferl, Christine M., Robitaille, Thomas P., Morales, Esteban F. E., Johnston, Katharine G.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

In contrast to most other galaxies, star formation rates in the Milky Way can be estimated directly from young stellar objects (YSOs). In the central molecular zone the star formation rate calculated from the number of YSOs with 24 μm emission is up to an order of magnitude higher than the value estimated from methods based on diffuse emission (such as free–free emission). Whether this effect is real or whether it indicates problems with either or both star formation rate measures is not currently known. In this paper, we investigate whether estimates based on YSOs could be heavily contaminated by more evolved objects such as main-sequence stars. We present radiative transfer models of YSOs and of main-sequence stars in a constant ambient medium which show that the main-sequence objects can indeed mimic YSOs at 24 μm. However, we show that in some cases the main-sequence models can be marginally resolved at 24 μm, whereas the YSO models are always unresolved. Based on the fraction of resolved MIPS 24 μm sources in the sample of YSOs previously used to compute the star formation rate, we estimate the fraction of misclassified "YSOs" to be at least 63%, which suggests that the star formation rate previously determined from YSOs is likely to be at least a factor of three too high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/53

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This YSO-based SFR value was later updated to 0.05-0.08 M⊙/yr due to contamination by main sequence stars.

    “This value was later updated to 0 . 05 -0 . 08 M ⊙ yr -1 due to contamination by main sequence stars (An et al. 2011; Immer et al. 2012; Koepferl et al. 2015; Nandakumar et al. 2018).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Koepferl et al. 2015

    Section 3.5 and the Summary say that some sources counted as YSOs may instead be more evolved objects, including main-sequence stars, and that the YSO-based SFR is likely overestimated by at least a factor of three. The paper does not give an updated SFR of 0.05–0.08 M⊙/yr; its Introduction reports the earlier YSO-based value as 0.14 M⊙/yr. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koepferl, C. M., Robitaille, T. P., Morales, E. F. E., & Johnston, K. G.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
Corresponding author
Koepferl, Christine M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-01-15
Volume
799
Issue
1
Pages
53
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2107052627
Cited by
50
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/M001296/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
young stellar objects, main-sequence stars, Central Molecular Zone, star formation rate, 24 micron emission, MIPS, radiative transfer modeling, misclassification, Milky Way, free-free emission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review