The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer
Open accessAbstract
Proton therapy treatments are based on a proton RBE (relative biological effectiveness) relative to high-energy photons of 1.1. The use of this generic, spatially invariant RBE within tumors and normal tissues disregards the evidence that proton RBE varies with linear energy transfer (LET), physiological and biological factors, and clinical endpoint. Based on the available experimental data from published literature, this review analyzes relationships of RBE with dose, biological endpoint and physical properties of proton beams. The review distinguishes between endpoints relevant for tumor control probability and those potentially relevant for normal tissue complication. Numerous endpoints and experiments on sub-cellular damage and repair effects are discussed. Despite the large amount of data, considerable uncertainties in proton RBE values remain. As an average RBE for cell survival in the center of a typical spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), the data support a value of ~1.15 at 2 Gy/fraction. The proton RBE increases with increasing LETd and thus with depth in an SOBP from ~1.1 in the entrance region, to ~1.15 in the center, ~1.35 at the distal edge and ~1.7 in the distal fall-off (when averaged over all cell lines, which may not be clinically representative). For small modulation widths the values could be increased. Furthermore, there is a trend of an increase in RBE as (α/β)x decreases. In most cases the RBE also increases with decreasing dose, specifically for systems with low (α/β)x. Data on RBE for endpoints other than clonogenic cell survival are too diverse to allow general statements other than that the RBE is, on average, in line with a value of ~1.1. This review can serve as a source for defining input parameters for applying or refining biophysical models and to identify endpoints where additional radiobiological data are needed in order to reduce the uncertainties to clinically acceptable levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses
Rothkamm, K., & Löbrich, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0830918100 · Cited by 1,645 · cited 24×
“Green et al (2001) compared proton and photon induced DNA damage not distinguishing between SSB and DSB.”
BackgroundInfluentialRelative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy
Paganetti, H., Niemierko, A., Ancukiewicz, M., Gerweck, L. E., Goitein, M., Loeffler, J. S., & Suit, H. D. (2002) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02754-2 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationRange uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations
Paganetti, H. (2012) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/r99 · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationTwo genetic hits (more or less) to cancer
Knudson, A. G. (2001) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/35101031 · Cited by 1,127
Bentzen, S. M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1950 · Cited by 1,096
New insights on cell death from radiation exposure
Prise, K. M., Schettino, G., Folkard, M., & Held, K. D. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70246-1 · Cited by 382
Elsässer, T., Weyrather, W. K., Friedrich, T., Durante, M., Iancu, G., Krämer, M., Kragl, G., Brons, S., Winter, M., Weber, K.-J., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.014 · Cited by 351
Enzymatic Processing of Radiation-Induced Free Radical Damage in DNA
Wallace, S. S. (1998) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3579809 · Cited by 334
Friedrich, T., Scholz, U., ElsaSser, T., Durante, M., & Scholz, M. (2013) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrs114 · Cited by 287
Induction and Repair of Clustered DNA Lesions: What Do We Know So Far?
Georgakilas, A. G., O'Neill, P., & Stewart, R. D. (2013) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3041.1 · Cited by 278
Cited by
Stewart, R. D., Streitmatter, S. W., Argento, D. C., Kirkby, C., Goorley, J. T., Moffitt, G., Jevremovic, T., & Sandison, G. A. (2015) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8249 · Cited by 103
Applied nuclear physics at the new high-energy particle accelerator facilities
Durante, M., Golubev, A., Park, W.-Y., & Trautmann, C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.004 · Cited by 72
Enhancing Proton Therapy Efficacy Through Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitization
Ma, J., Shen, H., & Mi, Z. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13221841 · Cited by 23
In vivo validation of the BIANCA biophysical model: benchmarking against rat spinal cord RBE data
Carante, M. P., Aricò, G., Ferrari, A., Karger, C. P., Kozlowska, W., Mairani, A., Sala, P., & Ballarini, F. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21113973 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Paganetti, H.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-10-31
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- R419-R472
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2083770395
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 137
- FWCI
- 34.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/r419
- The paper
- Paganetti, H. (2014). Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/r419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.